From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@vlnb.net>
To: "Pádraig Brady" <P@draigBrady.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Btrfs: a copy on write, snapshotting FS
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 14:01:22 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4677A972.6030909@vlnb.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46779DB1.7060807@draigBrady.com>
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
>
>>I would also suggest one more feature: support for block level
>>de-duplication. I mean:
>>
>>1. Ability for Btrfs to have blocks in several files to point to the
>>same block on disk
>>
>>2. Support for new syscall or IOCTL to de-duplicate as a single
>>transaction two or more blocks on disk, i.e. link them to one of them
>>and free others
>>
>>3. De-de-duplicate blocks on disk, i.e. copy them on write
>>
>>I suppose that de-duplication itself would be done by some user space
>>process that would scan files, determine blocks with the same data and
>>then de-duplicate them by using syscall or IOCTL (2).
>>
>>That would be very usable feature, which in most cases would allow to
>>shrink occupied disk space on 50-90%.
>
> Have you references for this number?
No, I've seen it somewhere and it well confirms with my own observations.
> In my experience one gets a lot of benefit from
> the much simpler process of "de-duplication" of files.
Yes, sure, de-duplication on files level brings its benefits, but on FS
blocks level it would bring ever more benefits, because there are many
more or less big files, which are different as a whole, but with a lot
of the same blocks. Simple example of such files is UNIX-style mail
boxes on a mail server.
> Note a checksum stored in file metadata,
> that is automatically invalidated on write would
> speed up user space file de duplification,
> and rsync, etc....
Sure, file level deduplication is simpler to implement, but it is
generally less powerful, than FS block level one. And seems it should
not be hard to add the above (1)-(3) features in the existing Btrfs
structure, especially on this stage, when the disk format isn't
stabilized yet.
> Pádraig.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-19 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-12 16:10 [ANNOUNCE] Btrfs: a copy on write, snapshotting FS Chris Mason
2007-06-12 19:53 ` Mike Snitzer
2007-06-12 20:14 ` Chris Mason
2007-06-13 3:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-06-13 10:17 ` Chris Mason
2007-06-13 3:46 ` John Stoffel
2007-06-13 10:35 ` Chris Mason
2007-06-13 14:00 ` John Stoffel
2007-06-13 14:54 ` Chris Mason
2007-06-13 16:12 ` John Stoffel
2007-06-13 16:34 ` Chris Mason
2007-06-13 16:25 ` Grzegorz Kulewski
2007-06-14 18:20 ` Chuck Lever
2007-06-14 18:48 ` Chris Mason
2007-06-15 17:17 ` Chuck Lever
2007-06-18 14:41 ` Chris Mason
2007-06-18 17:37 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2007-06-18 20:08 ` John Stoffel
2007-06-19 9:11 ` Pádraig Brady
2007-06-19 10:01 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin [this message]
2007-06-19 18:20 ` david
2007-06-20 8:41 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2007-06-19 12:04 ` Chris Mason
2007-06-19 14:00 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2007-06-19 18:24 ` david
2007-06-19 18:28 ` Philipp Matthias Hahn
2007-06-20 8:44 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2007-06-20 9:18 ` Ph. Marek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-06-13 5:45 Albert Cahalan
2007-06-13 12:00 ` Chris Mason
2007-06-13 16:14 ` Albert Cahalan
2007-06-13 16:57 ` Chris Mason
2007-06-14 6:59 ` Albert Cahalan
2007-06-14 12:30 ` Chris Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4677A972.6030909@vlnb.net \
--to=vst@vlnb.net \
--cc=P@draigBrady.com \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox