From: John Sigler <linux.kernel@free.fr>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Dumping the checksums in a module
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 16:40:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4677EACF.2000202@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1182259085.3014.5.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-06-19 at 13:59 +0200, John Sigler wrote:
>
>> As far as I understand (which is not very far), if I define
>> CONFIG_MODVERSIONS,
>
> just don't enable modversions.. it doesn't provide you any real safety
> at all..... and it makes your build a LOT slower.
I'm confused. What is the consensus on MODVERSIONS around here?
How many people share your views?
I was under the impression MODVERSIONS was a good thing(TM).
If I don't enable CONFIG_MODVERSIONS, then I'll have to recompile my
out-of-tree modules every time I upgrade the kernel, even if I'm just
upgrading from 2.6.20.7 to 2.6.20.8, unless I force the insertion.
I also have a few binary modules. If I force the insertion, I won't know
they have become binary incompatible until they blow up later, or,
worse, lead to silent corruption.
Please correct any and all misconceptions.
Regards.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-19 14:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-19 11:59 Dumping the checksums in a module John Sigler
2007-06-19 13:18 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-06-19 14:40 ` John Sigler [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-18 15:02 John Sigler
2007-05-18 20:27 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-18 20:46 ` Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-22 8:19 ` John Sigler
2007-05-22 8:13 ` John Sigler
2007-05-22 19:53 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-23 15:18 ` John Sigler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4677EACF.2000202@free.fr \
--to=linux.kernel@free.fr \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox