public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru>
To: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
	Linux Containers <containers@lists.osdl.org>,
	Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch -rss] Make RSS accounting display more user friendly
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 18:05:53 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46811D41.3020504@sw.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46810C68.7020603@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Balbir Singh wrote:
> Kirill Korotaev wrote:
> 
>>Paul Menage wrote:
>>
>>>On 6/22/07, Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>The problem with input in bytes is that the user will have to ensure
>>>>that the input is
>>>>a  multiple of page size, which implies that she would need to use the
>>>>calculator every time.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Having input in bytes seems pretty natural to me. Why not just have
>>>the RSS controller round the input to the nearest page (or whatever
>>>granularity of memory the controller is able to limit at)?
>>
>>totally agree with Paul.
>>
>>Kirill
>>
> 
> Kirill
> 
> If someone assigns a rss_limit of 1 byte and sees a usage of 1 page,
> won't that be confusing. But having said that it's not a big
> change, it should be easy to accommodate.

Well, from my expirience pages are hardly understandable by people.
So bytes are always better and more convinient for non-programmers.
Rounding is not that big issue, since people still get the result
they expect (unlike to the case when they mess up with the page size).

Thanks,
Kirill

P.S. 1 byte limit is not that common :)


  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-26 14:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-20 15:46 [patch -rss] Make RSS accounting display more user friendly Balbir Singh
2007-06-21 19:17 ` Paul Menage
2007-06-22  2:09   ` Pavel Emelianov
2007-06-22 15:39     ` Paul Menage
2007-06-23  3:48       ` Balbir Singh
2007-06-25  7:19         ` Paul Menage
2007-06-26 12:39           ` Kirill Korotaev
2007-06-26 12:54             ` Balbir Singh
2007-06-26 14:05               ` Kirill Korotaev [this message]
2028-02-27  7:39           ` Balbir Singh
2007-07-09 11:38             ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-07-10  4:44               ` Balbir Singh
2007-07-10 15:29                 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-07-10 15:40                   ` Balbir Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46811D41.3020504@sw.ru \
    --to=dev@sw.ru \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox