From: Andreas Steinmetz <ast@domdv.de>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: mss to pmtu clamping partially broken?
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:06:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4684F5D3.8020506@domdv.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4684F4FB.9070807@trash.net>
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Andreas Steinmetz wrote:
>> Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>
>>> Andreas Steinmetz wrote:
>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>> The tcpdump on the client shows that the mss of the incoming syn reply
>>>> packet is *NOT* clamped to the ppp interface mtu.
>>>
>>> You forgot to mention *how* you're clamping the MSS. Using
>>> TCPMSS? Do you have a rule for incoming packets?
>>>
>>
>> The relevant iptables commands I do use for masquerading and clamping are:
>>
>> iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ppp0 -j MASQUERADE
>> iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --tcp-flags SYN,RST SYN -j TCPMSS \
>> --clamp-mss-to-pmtu
>
>
> Two things here:
>
> - tcpdumps on ppp0 will show unclamped packets since they haven't
> been forwarded yet
>
That is true, I know this.
> - assuming you have ethernet internally, the PMTU from your router
> to the internal hosts is 1500, so it won't do any clamping.
>
Yep, internal PMTU is 1500, still the incoming packets are clamped to
1452 on the one line and not clamped on the other.
> Does that explain it?
>
> A useful thing for TCPMSS for routers would be to clamp to the
> minimum of the PMTU of both directions. But thats not supported
> so far.
>
I wonder, as somteimes it gets clamped. If it would never have been
clamped I wouldn't have asked.
--
Andreas Steinmetz SPAMmers use robotrap@domdv.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-29 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-29 11:09 mss to pmtu clamping partially broken? Andreas Steinmetz
2007-06-29 11:39 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-29 11:58 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2007-06-29 12:03 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-29 12:06 ` Andreas Steinmetz [this message]
2007-06-29 12:13 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-06-29 12:16 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2007-07-02 17:02 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2007-06-30 8:35 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-07-02 17:04 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2007-07-02 18:28 ` Phil Dibowitz
2007-07-02 19:16 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
2007-07-02 19:35 ` Phil Dibowitz
2007-07-02 19:50 ` Krzysztof Oledzki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4684F5D3.8020506@domdv.de \
--to=ast@domdv.de \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox