From: John Sigler <linux.kernel@free.fr>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT] High frequency periodic timer
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 15:18:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4688FB14.90307@free.fr> (raw)
Hello everyone,
I have been experimenting with the CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT patch for a few
months. Specifically kernel 2.6.20.7-rt8.
http://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page
I've been running into some unexpected problems, so I wanted to ask
those who have some experience with this patch what they thought.
Here's a brief description of my application:
System A periodically sends timestamped packets. These packets travel
over a network, or through a network emulator, and get randomly dropped
or delayed by a random amount of time. These packets reach system B at
some point. System B uses the timestamp to re-send the packets smoothly,
as if they had been produced on B, with only a constant time-shift.
Basically, B acts as a "dejittering" router.
I have implemented this with high-resolution timers. Every time the
timer fires, I send one packet. In "parallel", I buffer incoming packets
that arrive from system A.
Consider 1316-byte packets and a 80 Mbit/s stream bit rate.
This means the timer period is 1316*8 / 80 = 131.6 µs
I've been wondering whether having such a small period (high frequency)
might be a problem / challenge for the real-time kernel (scheduler, IRQ
handler, other component).
The CPU used is mid-range (i.e. 1.5 GHz Celeron M) single core, and it
easily copes with just the receiving part.
But I have seen some odd behavior (random crashes in my program) that
must mean I have made some incorrect assumptions.
What do you all think?
Regards.
reply other threads:[~2007-07-02 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4688FB14.90307@free.fr \
--to=linux.kernel@free.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox