* state of stack patches
@ 2007-07-05 20:34 Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-06 21:31 ` William Lee Irwin III
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge @ 2007-07-05 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: William Lee Irwin III
Cc: Andrew Morton, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Andi Kleen
Hi Bill,
What's the state of your stack patches? I'm still using the ones you
posted some time ago, and they seem like useful things to have in the
kernel. Is there anything preventing you from pushing them upstream?
Thanks,
J
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: state of stack patches
2007-07-05 20:34 state of stack patches Jeremy Fitzhardinge
@ 2007-07-06 21:31 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-07-07 4:51 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: William Lee Irwin III @ 2007-07-06 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge; +Cc: Andrew Morton, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Andi Kleen
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 01:34:25PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> What's the state of your stack patches? I'm still using the ones you
> posted some time ago, and they seem like useful things to have in the
> kernel. Is there anything preventing you from pushing them upstream?
Just one thing: 2.6.22. I can, of course, do updating for -mm, -ak, et al.
-- wli
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: state of stack patches
2007-07-06 21:31 ` William Lee Irwin III
@ 2007-07-07 4:51 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge @ 2007-07-07 4:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: William Lee Irwin III
Cc: Andrew Morton, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Andi Kleen
William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 01:34:25PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
>> What's the state of your stack patches? I'm still using the ones you
>> posted some time ago, and they seem like useful things to have in the
>> kernel. Is there anything preventing you from pushing them upstream?
>>
>
> Just one thing: 2.6.22. I can, of course, do updating for -mm, -ak, et al.
>
Yes, I was thinking they're the just the thing to cook in -mm for a
while, until the appropriate upstream time comes.
J
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-07-07 4:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-05 20:34 state of stack patches Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-06 21:31 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-07-07 4:51 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox