From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755875AbXGGGrd (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jul 2007 02:47:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752140AbXGGGrY (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jul 2007 02:47:24 -0400 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.177]:40845 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752404AbXGGGrX (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Jul 2007 02:47:23 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JopVIlmu2/mLifDtBd3zeLimXAy+9zTlFID1HMWR/E5YGIgbU8+rFxlI+JPicKXGWj2y7gIWZTwKA5fxA0K/41/gzrwS6x1RgizjowHikJB+NkRulkEIixS+EnGSvL3gtUwbxnCjAwUNGMGNdDWk1kzTyXpiRn8egfsunU36k5w= Message-ID: <468F36F5.4010803@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 15:47:17 +0900 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070307) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Miles Lane CC: Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 -- BUG - EIP: [] sysfs_addrm_finish+0x1c2/0x226 SS:ESP 0068:c5ff9db8 References: <20070703094916.e60d4df7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <468B3CFF.7020903@gmail.com> <468C9E74.4080606@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (restoring cc to lkml) Hello, Miles. Miles Lane wrote: > With this patch applied, I can't boot at all. I have attached an OOPS > screenshot, since I don't have a serial debugging station set up. I > am leaving LKML out of the loop, because of the attachment. Weird, that's unrelated path. It seems sd->s_parent is NULL in sysfs_link_sibling(), which doesn't make sense because it's being called from sysfs_create_link() which makes sure parent_sd isn't NULL && sysfs_addrm_start() should have caused oops earlier as it deferences parent_sd. Can you please retry the test (test clean 2.6.22-rc6-mm1, apply patch, rebuild and test)? Thanks. -- tejun