Re: Please revert 21564fd2a3deb48200b595332f9ed4c9f311f2a7

Alan Cox
2007-07-09T09:29:00Z

> It will be solved differently longer term, but short term the fix
> was still needed. There are limits on what can be done late
> in the release cycle so simple patches win.
>
> Besides none of the "NAK"s were particularly inspired in my opinion;
> there were no clear technical objections brought forward.

There were a considerable number of sensible logical objections. You just
didn't agree with them. You've now effectively made .22 unsupportable
since we don't know if someone has binary virtualiser crap loaded.

Alan