Re: [PATCH 0/16] Pid namespaces

[Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>]

sukadev@us.ibm.com wrote:
> Pavel Emelianov [xemul@openvz.org] wrote:
> | This is "submition for inclusion" of hierarchical, not kconfig
> | configurable, zero overheaded ;) pid namespaces.
> | 
> | The overall idea is the following:
> | 
> | The namespace are organized as a tree - once a task is cloned
> | with CLONE_NEWPIDS (yes, I've also switched to it :) the new
> 
> Can you really clone() a pid namespace all by itself ?
> copy_namespaces() has the following:
> 
> 
>         if (!(flags & (CLONE_NEWNS | CLONE_NEWUTS | CLONE_NEWIPC | CLONE_NEWUSER)))
>                 return 0;
> 
> doesn't it mean you cannot create a pid namespace using clone() unless
> one of the above flags are also specified ?
> 
> unshare_nsproxy_namespaces() has the following correct check:
> 
>         if (!(unshare_flags & (CLONE_NEWNS | CLONE_NEWUTS | CLONE_NEWIPC |
>                                CLONE_NEWUSER | CLONE_NEWPIDS)))
>                 return 0;

I have already pointed this out. I attached the previous version of
this patch where I cloned the namespaces via unshare :( However the
copy_pid_ns code looks correct. I will resend it altogether.

My bad. I have to stop working at times I want to sleep...
 
> BTW, why not use CLONE_NEWPID and drop the 'S' ? We don't have 'S' with
> other namespaces.

CLONE_NEWPID? Hm... I see no difference. OK I'll switch to it.

> Suka
>