From: Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@sw.ru>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, holt@sgi.com
Subject: Re: [patch] mm: recheck lock rlim after f_op->mmap() method
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:39:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46949751.1060701@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707101813390.4717@blonde.wat.veritas.com>
Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2007, Dmitry Monakhov wrote:
>> Some device drivers can change vm_flags in their f_op->mmap
>> method. In order to be on the safe side we have to recheck
>> lock rlimit. Now we have to check lock rlimit from two places,
>> let's move this common code to helper functon.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
>> ---
>> mm/mmap.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> 1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> Or would this simpler patch be the right one? I suspect the
> mspec driver only says VM_LOCKED because of a deep-seated but
> irrational fear that its pages might fall into reclaim.
>
> (I'd like to take out VM_RESERVED too, but that can always happen
> another, indefinitely postponed time; there are others of those.)
Hi Hugh,
My mind is rusty on this one, so I checked with Robin Holt and his
is too .... most likely mspec has it for legacy problems, if your
change shows up to cause new problems, we'll fix them when they appear.
So from our side, it's fine to go ahead with this patch.
Cheers,
Jes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-11 8:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-09 18:49 [patch] mm: recheck lock rlim after f_op->mmap() method Dmitry Monakhov
2007-07-10 17:27 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-07-10 17:53 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2007-07-10 19:48 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-07-11 8:39 ` Jes Sorensen [this message]
2007-07-11 18:24 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-07-11 9:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-11 10:12 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2007-07-11 10:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-11 18:03 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-07-13 9:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-13 8:13 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-13 13:02 ` Hugh Dickins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46949751.1060701@sgi.com \
--to=jes@sgi.com \
--cc=dmonakhov@sw.ru \
--cc=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox