From: Hanno Zulla <abos@hanno.de>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Slow IRQ handling? (was: Nova-T, cx88-dvb & "cx88_wakeup: 2 buffers handled (should be 1)")
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:29:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4694BF03.5070508@hanno.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46949AFD.5030101@redhat.com>
Hi,
[ please cc me. Thanks. ]
> I've added the printk some years ago. I stopped maintaining v4l/dvb
> bits two years ago, so it's a bit a shot into the dark because I have no
> idea what has changed recently in the driver.
Indeed, it appears that this driver has no maintainer right now. (Or the
maintainer is on holidays. I had no luck finding an active maintainer
via the linux-dvb mailing list or via email in the past weeks).
> The message is in no way critical, the driver should cope just fine with
> the situation, and as usually some more buffers are queued for dma it
> also doesn't imply dvb stream data got lost. It seems in your case some
> data actually got lost though, otherwise the effect wouldn't be visible.
>
> Background: The card raises an interrupt for each filled buffer, so in
> theory each time the irq handler runs it should handle a single buffer.
> If it is more than one it means the irq handler wasn't called in time
> or wasn't called at all for some reason.
Thanks for clarifying this.
> Could be someone in the kernel blocked interrupts for a insane long
> time, so the hardware managed to fill the one more buffer before the irq
> handler was actually called. Could be IRQ handling in the cx88 driver
> is screwed. Could be a scheduling issue (Is this a core2 duo? If so
> check the longish discussion on about that here in lkml, subject "long
> freezes on thinkpad t60").
Yes, it is a Core2Duo with an Intel chipset.
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8283450/cpuinfo
However, a user with a single-core AMD cpu and a VIA chipset reports the
same problem.
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8283450/cpuinfo
See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/119115
for more info.
> Could also be the irq handler for the other device sharing the same irq
> being very slow. Any pattern here that it is linked to some specific
> device sharing the irq?
No idea, I did not see any pattern here. Also, the problem on my system
appears with every PCI slot I tried.
What do you suggest? How can I debug this issue so that you kernel guys
can look into it?
Thanks,
Hanno
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-11 11:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-10 17:34 Nova-T, cx88-dvb & "cx88_wakeup: 2 buffers handled (should be 1)" Hanno Zulla
2007-07-11 8:55 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-07-11 11:29 ` Hanno Zulla [this message]
2007-07-19 20:13 ` Slow IRQ handling? (was: Nova-T, cx88-dvb & "cx88_wakeup: 2 buffers handled (should be 1)") Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4694BF03.5070508@hanno.de \
--to=abos@hanno.de \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox