From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Shailabh Nagar <nagar1234@in.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optimize struct task_delay_info
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:16:22 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4694C30E.1030607@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1184138034.3068.51.camel@ymzhang>
Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> struct task_delay_info is used by per process block I/O delay statistics
> feature which is useful in kernel. This struct is not optimized.
>
> My patch against kernel 2.6.22 shrinks it a half.
>
> 1) Delete blkio_start and blkio_end. As the collection happens in
> io_schedule and io_schedule_timeout, we use local variables to
> replace them;
> 2) Delete lock. The change to the protected data has no nested cases.
> In addition, the result is for performance data collection, so it’s
> unnecessary to add such lock.
> 3) Delete flags. It just has one value. Use the most significant bit of
> blkio_delay (64 bits) to mark it..
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yanmin <yanmin.zhang@intel.com>
Hi, Yanmin,
Did you see any particular performance issues with the delay accounting
patches? Is the patch tested; could you please provide test results?
Meanwhile, I'll review these patches and I am correcting Shailabh's id
to his new email id.
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-11 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-11 7:13 [PATCH] Optimize struct task_delay_info Zhang, Yanmin
2007-07-11 11:46 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2007-07-18 4:30 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2007-07-23 1:08 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2007-07-11 12:27 ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-12 8:37 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2007-07-12 18:21 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2007-07-13 1:52 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2007-07-23 5:14 ` Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4694C30E.1030607@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nagar1234@in.ibm.com \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox