From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:26:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <469512C1.6090406@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1184054902.12336.19.camel@Homer.simpson.net>
Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 19:33 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> i'm pleased to announce release -v19 of the CFS scheduler patchset.
>
> I've taken mainline git tree (freshly integrated CFS!) out for a
> multimedia spin. I tested watching movies and listenign to music in the
> presence of various sleep/burn loads, pure burn loads, and mixed loads.
> All was peachy here.. I saw no frame drops or sound skips or other
> artifacts under any load where the processor could possibly meet demand.
>
I would agree with preliminary testing, save that if you get a lot of
processes updating the screen at once, there seems to be a notable case
of processes getting no CPU for 100-300ms, followed by a lot of CPU.
I see this clearly with the "glitch1" test with four scrolling xterms
and glxgears, but also watching videos with little busy processes on the
screen. The only version where I never see this in test or with real use
is cfs-v13.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
"We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from
the machinations of the wicked." - from Slashdot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-11 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-06 17:33 [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19 Ingo Molnar
2007-07-08 17:46 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-07-09 22:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 21:44 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-07-10 8:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-07-11 17:26 ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
2007-07-11 20:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-12 12:41 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-13 21:19 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-16 21:34 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-07-16 21:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 4:22 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-17 5:01 ` Ian Kent
2007-07-17 7:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 11:17 ` Ian Kent
2007-07-17 17:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-18 1:24 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-18 6:19 ` Ian Kent
2007-07-17 16:30 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-07-17 21:16 ` David Schwartz
2007-07-18 5:59 ` Ian Kent
2007-07-18 7:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-18 13:50 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-18 17:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-18 16:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-18 17:31 ` Ian Kent
2007-07-18 21:37 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-19 8:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 14:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 17:06 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-19 17:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 17:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 17:26 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-19 17:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-20 2:32 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-19 8:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-14 11:34 ` Markus
2007-07-14 15:11 ` Markus
2007-07-16 9:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 17:59 ` Markus
2007-07-17 7:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 13:06 ` Markus
2007-07-17 17:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 17:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 19:42 ` Markus
2007-07-17 20:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 20:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-17 20:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 22:03 ` Markus
2007-07-20 22:26 ` Markus
2007-07-22 11:59 ` konqueror suddenly vanishing, "konqueror: Fatal IO error: client killed" Ingo Molnar
2007-07-22 14:26 ` Markus
2007-08-09 17:34 ` [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19 Markus
2007-08-10 7:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-14 17:15 ` Markus
2007-10-17 0:02 ` Markus
2007-07-14 17:19 ` Ed Tomlinson
2007-07-15 5:25 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-07-15 12:53 ` Markus
2007-07-15 19:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-07-15 21:11 ` Markus
2007-07-16 6:42 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-07-16 8:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 9:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 11:10 ` Ed Tomlinson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-07-08 20:51 Al Boldi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=469512C1.6090406@tmr.com \
--to=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox