public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
To: Jeremy Linton <jli@greshamstorage.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>,
	Linux Scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][BUG] Incorrect SCSI transfer length computation from odd sized scsi_execute_async() transfers.
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:19:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <469581BA.4010009@cs.wisc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46957820.9090008@greshamstorage.com>

Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Any function which use scsi_execute_async() and transfers "odd" sized 
> data that doesn't align correctly with the segment sizes may have its 
> transfer length padded out to the closest segment size.
> 
> For writes, this results in unnecessary data being transfered to the 
> SCSI target. For reads, it affects the residual data length being 
> returned to the application since the residual length will be based on 
> the padded transfer size rather than the actual request size.
> 
> The easiest way to see this is by trying to read using the SG_IO ioctl a 
> large (>32k) buffer size from a tape device that only has a few bytes of 
> data stored for the current block. The resulting resid will generally be 
> incorrect.
> 
> I've fixed this simply by changing scsi_req_map_sg() so that it places 
> the requested transfer length in rq->data_len rather than the sum of all 
> the sg segments.
> 
> This patch applies against scsi_lib.c in 2.6.22.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton <jli@greshamstorage.com>
> 
> 
> --- linux-2.6.22/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c.orig   2007-07-11 
> 19:07:06.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6.22/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c        2007-07-11 
> 18:43:36.000000000 -0500
> @@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static int scsi_req_map_sg(struct reques
>         }
> 
>         rq->buffer = rq->data = NULL;
> -       rq->data_len = data_len;
> +       rq->data_len = bufflen;
>         return 0;
> 

I think you needed some other bits in there. See this patch 
http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=117392208211297&w=2

I tried just setting the bufflen first, and that still had problems. 
Could you try the patch here

http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=117392208211297&w=2

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-12  1:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-12  0:38 [PATCH][BUG] Incorrect SCSI transfer length computation from odd sized scsi_execute_async() transfers Jeremy Linton
2007-07-12  1:19 ` Mike Christie [this message]
2007-07-12  2:25   ` Jeremy Linton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=469581BA.4010009@cs.wisc.edu \
    --to=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=jli@greshamstorage.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox