From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758514AbXGLGJk (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 02:09:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751692AbXGLGJd (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 02:09:33 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:44292 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751722AbXGLGJd (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 02:09:33 -0400 Message-ID: <4695C564.5060500@goop.org> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 23:08:36 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070615) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jesper Juhl CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] 4K stacks default, not a debug thing any more...? References: <200707111916.35036.jesper.juhl@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200707111916.35036.jesper.juhl@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jesper Juhl wrote: > One of the big problem spots was XFS, but that got some stack usage > fixes recently, and the 4K stack option has been around for quite a > while now, so people really should have gotten around to fixing any > code that can't handle it. Are there still any big problem areas > remaining? > I get frequent crashes when I use 4k stacks with XFS+lvm, using recent kernels. When did XFS stack use reductions go in? J