From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:41:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46962173.2050603@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070711205556.GA27266@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> I've taken mainline git tree (freshly integrated CFS!) out for a
>>> multimedia spin. I tested watching movies and listenign to music in
>>> the presence of various sleep/burn loads, pure burn loads, and mixed
>>> loads. All was peachy here.. I saw no frame drops or sound skips or
>>> other artifacts under any load where the processor could possibly
>>> meet demand.
>>>
>> I would agree with preliminary testing, save that if you get a lot of
>> processes updating the screen at once, there seems to be a notable
>> case of processes getting no CPU for 100-300ms, followed by a lot of
>> CPU.
>>
>> I see this clearly with the "glitch1" test with four scrolling xterms
>> and glxgears, but also watching videos with little busy processes on
>> the screen. The only version where I never see this in test or with
>> real use is cfs-v13.
>>
>
> just as a test, does this go away if you:
>
> renice -20 pidof `Xorg`
>
> i.e. is this connected to the way X is scheduled?
>
>
Partial answer: -10 didn't help with v16, I'll try more boost ASAP, but
power has been spotty in upstate NY, 20k+ customers with none and the
rest of us subject to "load shedding" with zero warning, and the test
machines have UPS but no generator, so I hesitate to use them while
power is unstable.
> Another thing to check would be whether it goes away if you set the
> granularity to some really finegrained value:
>
> echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_wakeup_granularity_ns
> echo 500000 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_granularity_ns
>
> this really pushes things - but it tests the theory whether this is
> related to granularity.
>
Will do, you suggested dropping sched_granularity_ns to 1000000 earlier,
and that didn't do it, but I didn't change the wakeup, and will test
these values later today.
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
CTO TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-12 12:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-06 17:33 [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19 Ingo Molnar
2007-07-08 17:46 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-07-09 22:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 21:44 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-07-10 8:08 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-07-11 17:26 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-11 20:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-12 12:41 ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
2007-07-13 21:19 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-16 21:34 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-07-16 21:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 4:22 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-17 5:01 ` Ian Kent
2007-07-17 7:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 11:17 ` Ian Kent
2007-07-17 17:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-18 1:24 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-18 6:19 ` Ian Kent
2007-07-17 16:30 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-07-17 21:16 ` David Schwartz
2007-07-18 5:59 ` Ian Kent
2007-07-18 7:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-18 13:50 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-18 17:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-18 16:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-18 17:31 ` Ian Kent
2007-07-18 21:37 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-19 8:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 14:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 17:06 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-19 17:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 17:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-19 17:26 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-19 17:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-20 2:32 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-07-19 8:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-14 11:34 ` Markus
2007-07-14 15:11 ` Markus
2007-07-16 9:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 17:59 ` Markus
2007-07-17 7:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 13:06 ` Markus
2007-07-17 17:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 17:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 19:42 ` Markus
2007-07-17 20:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 20:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-17 20:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-17 22:03 ` Markus
2007-07-20 22:26 ` Markus
2007-07-22 11:59 ` konqueror suddenly vanishing, "konqueror: Fatal IO error: client killed" Ingo Molnar
2007-07-22 14:26 ` Markus
2007-08-09 17:34 ` [patch] CFS scheduler, -v19 Markus
2007-08-10 7:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-14 17:15 ` Markus
2007-10-17 0:02 ` Markus
2007-07-14 17:19 ` Ed Tomlinson
2007-07-15 5:25 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-07-15 12:53 ` Markus
2007-07-15 19:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-07-15 21:11 ` Markus
2007-07-16 6:42 ` Mike Galbraith
2007-07-16 8:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 9:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-16 11:10 ` Ed Tomlinson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-07-08 20:51 Al Boldi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46962173.2050603@tmr.com \
--to=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox