From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935551AbXGLQpn (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:45:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752248AbXGLQpg (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:45:36 -0400 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([63.81.120.155]:35827 "EHLO imap.sh.mvista.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752769AbXGLQpf (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:45:35 -0400 Message-ID: <46965B28.7000703@ru.mvista.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 20:47:36 +0400 From: Sergei Shtylyov Organization: MontaVista Software Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: ru, en-us, en-gb MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dwalker@mvista.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rt2] PowerPC: revert fix for threaded fasteoi IRQ handlers References: <200611192243.34850.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> <200705171719.34968.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> In-Reply-To: <200705171719.34968.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, I wrote: > Revert the change to the "fasteoi" type chips as after handle_fasteoi_irq() had > been fixed, they've become meaningless (and even dangerous -- as was the case > with Celleb that has been fixed earlier)... > Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov > --- > The patch in question wasn't even initially accepted but then was erroneously > restored along with the TOD patch. I've asked to revert it but to no avail, > so here's the formal patch to revert it at last... Now that the -rt patch has been first release in the broken-out version, let me tell you that the following 3 patches in the series can be just annihilated: preempt-irqs-ppc-ack-irq-fixups.patch preempt-irqs-ppc-fix-b5.patch preempt-irqs-ppc-fix-more-fasteoi.patch as all that the latter two are doing is undoing the former one. WBR, Sergei