From: William Montgomery <william@opinicus.com>
To: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: e100 PCI bridge problem
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 21:27:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <469977EF.7050709@opinicus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3d4yuczqw.fsf@maximus.localdomain>
Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
>William Montgomery <william@opinicus.com> writes:
>
>
>
>>I am using a PCI analyzer and it shows the bus in an idle state after
>>the lockup. The PCI transactions just prior to the lockup show a
>>couple of interrupts from the card which appear to be handled
>>correctly. Anything I should be looking for in particular?
>>
>>
>
>I'd try to check with other machine using "secondary" bus slot.
>BTW: Are you able to analyze the "primary" bus transactions while
>using the card in "secondary" bus? Perhaps there is something
>wrong in front of the motherboard bridge?
>
>A broken motherboard may be hard to diagnose, unfortunately.
>
>Can you post something like "lspci -vv" taken on both machines?
>
>
I will post more info on Monday when I am able to power them up.
I'm not so sure the motherboard is broken, I am leaning more towards a
misconfigured
bridge. This computer is a 4U 19 inch rackmount chassis with a PCMIG
CPU and a 12 slot PCI backplane. I have done a lot of testing with this
box trying to characterize this problem. In one case I have put 3 Intel
PRO 100S NICs on the secondary PCI bus and they ran under heavy stress
test loads overnight. The 4 port NIC seems to be the only card that
doesnt want to cooperate.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-15 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-13 17:37 e100 PCI bridge problem William Montgomery
2007-07-13 20:36 ` Kok, Auke
2007-07-13 22:30 ` William Montgomery
2007-07-13 22:41 ` Kok, Auke
2007-07-14 0:54 ` William Montgomery
2007-07-14 14:43 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-07-14 23:17 ` William Montgomery
2007-07-14 23:49 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-07-15 1:27 ` William Montgomery [this message]
2007-07-17 18:29 ` William Montgomery
2007-07-17 18:55 ` Kok, Auke
2007-07-17 19:37 ` William Montgomery
2007-07-17 21:04 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-07-17 20:54 ` Krzysztof Halasa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=469977EF.7050709@opinicus.com \
--to=william@opinicus.com \
--cc=khc@pm.waw.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox