From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc: jeremy@goop.org, jengelh@computergmbh.de, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk,
nmiell@comcast.net, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: *at syscalls for xattrs?
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 02:33:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <469B3B73.9010400@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1IAMWA-0004fM-00@dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu>
Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>
> The *at() thing basically gives you the advantages of a CWD without
> the disadvantages.
>
> For example it could be useful to implement the functionality of
> find(1) as a library interface.
>
What the *at() interfaces really do is fix/paper over a longstanding
wart in Unix: the cwd really should have been a standard file descriptor
(like stdin/stdout/stderr) instead of a magic piece of state maintained
in kernel space.
If they had been designed-in from the beginning I suspect we wouldn't
have had, say, stat() and fstat(), but simply statat() -- the "normal"
ones would simply be statat(stddir, path) and statat(fd, NULL)
respectively. Now it isn't quite so clean.
You can do some of that stuff with fchdir(), but *at() is much nicer,
minus the oddball Solaris naming with random presence and absence of f-
prefixes.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-16 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-15 19:46 *at syscalls for xattrs? Jan Engelhardt
2007-07-15 20:53 ` Al Viro
2007-07-15 21:13 ` Nicholas Miell
2007-07-15 22:23 ` Al Viro
2007-07-15 23:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-07-16 7:56 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-07-16 8:04 ` Al Viro
2007-07-16 8:30 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-16 9:05 ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-07-16 9:33 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2007-07-16 9:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-07-16 17:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-07-16 20:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-07-16 20:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-07-16 9:12 ` Andreas Schwab
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=469B3B73.9010400@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jengelh@computergmbh.de \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=nmiell@comcast.net \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox