From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936470AbXGRAXY (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:23:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757985AbXGRAXQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:23:16 -0400 Received: from smtpq1.groni1.gr.home.nl ([213.51.130.200]:34205 "EHLO smtpq1.groni1.gr.home.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756099AbXGRAXP (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Jul 2007 20:23:15 -0400 Message-ID: <469D5D2A.9000506@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 02:22:02 +0200 From: Rene Herman User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jesper Juhl CC: William Lee Irwin III , Alan Cox , Ray Lee , Bodo Eggert <7eggert@gmx.de>, Matt Mackall , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Linux Kernel Mailing List , David Chinner , Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] 4K stacks default, not a debug thing any more...? References: <8Gj55-hJ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <8GtnN-7TG-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <8GVjY-PL-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <469A5D7C.5010904@gmail.com> <469BF104.1040703@gmail.com> <2c0942db0707161537o2852a308s26e79235e897e282@mail.gmail.com> <20070716235438.1bdd0722@the-village.bc.nu> <20070717170127.GJ11781@holomorphy.com> <9a8748490707171639r41c085bfh857c5047a792dd0@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9a8748490707171639r41c085bfh857c5047a792dd0@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@home.nl for more information X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/18/2007 01:39 AM, Jesper Juhl wrote: > On 17/07/07, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> At hch's suggestion I rewrote the separate IRQ stack configurability >> patch into one making IRQ stacks mandatory and unconfigurable, and >> hence enabled with 8K stacks. >> > For what it's worth, that sounds good to me - like something that we > would want merged. Yes, seperate IRQ stacks make eminent sense in their own right. Andrea Arcangeli's current thread on soft pages: http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/6/346 is also interesting though in the context of 1-page stacks. Rene.