public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@gmail.com>
Cc: Gabriel C <nix.or.die@googlemail.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
	gregkh@suse.de, miles.lane@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysfs: kill an extra put in sysfs_create_link() failure path
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 23:57:44 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <469E2A68.6010307@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a781481a0707180748j4760ab8bo237c1abc02feb593@mail.gmail.com>

Satyam Sharma wrote:
> On 7/18/07, Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> wrote:
>> There is a subtle bug in sysfs_create_link() failure path.  When
>> symlink creation fails because there's already a node with the same
>> name, the target sysfs_dirent is put twice - once by failure path of
>> sysfs_create_link() and once more when the symlink is released.
> 
> The "symlink" is released? But the creation of the symlink is
> precisely what failed here ... did it not?
> 
>> Fix it by making only the symlink node responsible for putting
>> target_sd.
> 
> And again ... the changelog sounds confusing indeed, perhaps I'm
> not familiar enough with sysfs symlink-related terminology/semantics.
> Care to elaborate?
> 
>>         sd = sysfs_new_dirent(name, S_IFLNK|S_IRWXUGO, SYSFS_KOBJ_LINK);
>>         if (!sd)
>>                 goto out_put;
>> +
>>         sd->s_elem.symlink.target_sd = target_sd;
>> +       target_sd = NULL;       /* reference is now owned by the
>> symlink */
> 
> Wow. This looks like a very mysterious way to fix a mysterious bug :-)
> BTW I just looked over at sysfs_create_link() and ... it looks quite ...
> unnecessarily complicated/obfuscated ...

Well, I dunno.  Probably my taste just sucks.  Please feel free to
submit patches and/or suggest better ideas.

-- 
tejun

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-18 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-14 12:18 Oops while modprobing phy fixed module Gabriel C
2007-07-14 12:44 ` Gabriel C
2007-07-15  5:39 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-15 17:42   ` Gabriel C
2007-07-15 20:32     ` Gabriel C
2007-07-15 21:14     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-15 22:19       ` Gabriel C
2007-07-16 12:17         ` Gabriel C
2007-07-16 15:19           ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-16 15:41             ` Gabriel C
2007-07-16 16:18               ` Gabriel C
2007-07-16 16:54               ` Gabriel C
2007-07-16 18:23             ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-16 18:32               ` Gabriel C
2007-07-16 19:11                 ` Gabriel C
2007-07-16 19:13                   ` Gabriel C
2007-07-18  5:51                     ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-23 19:53                       ` Christoph Lameter
2007-07-24  6:35                         ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-18  7:14                     ` [PATCH] sysfs: kill an extra put in sysfs_create_link() failure path Tejun Heo
2007-07-18  7:38                       ` [PATCH] sysfs: cosmetic clean up on node creation failure paths Tejun Heo
2007-07-18 11:40                         ` Cornelia Huck
2007-07-18 11:16                       ` [PATCH] sysfs: kill an extra put in sysfs_create_link() failure path Cornelia Huck
2007-07-18 14:29                       ` Miles Lane
2007-07-18 14:48                       ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-18 14:57                         ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2007-07-18 15:16                           ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-18 15:30                             ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-18 15:53                               ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-18 16:08                                 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-18 16:20                               ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-18 15:43                             ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-18 16:06                               ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-18 16:30                                 ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-18 16:36                                   ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-18 16:41                                   ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-18 16:49                                     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-18 16:59                                       ` Miles Lane
2007-07-23 19:52             ` Oops while modprobing phy fixed module Christoph Lameter
2007-07-16 17:43     ` Vitaly Bordug

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=469E2A68.6010307@gmail.com \
    --to=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miles.lane@gmail.com \
    --cc=nix.or.die@googlemail.com \
    --cc=satyam.sharma@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox