From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1764280AbXGRWuf (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 18:50:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753333AbXGRWuY (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 18:50:24 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:42096 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752164AbXGRWuV (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 18:50:21 -0400 Message-ID: <469E9918.8040907@zytor.com> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:50:00 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rob Landley CC: Jan Engelhardt , Bodo Eggert <7eggert@gmx.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC][Patch] Allow not mounting a root fs References: <469002EB.7030902@zytor.com> <200707181751.10276.rob@landley.net> In-Reply-To: <200707181751.10276.rob@landley.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rob Landley wrote: > > Out of curiosity, do you know which setup? I know that it won't actually swap > anything out yet because no swap is mounted, but I thought that mounting > tmpfs and doing a swapon afterwards was ok... > Nope, I just know that the "obvious" way to do it crashes the kernel horribly. It looks based on the patchsets that have flown about recently as it's mostly a matter of initializing the icache. -hpa