From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758283AbXGSB61 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 21:58:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753235AbXGSB6R (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 21:58:17 -0400 Received: from smtpq2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl ([213.51.146.201]:45222 "EHLO smtpq2.tilbu1.nb.home.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752333AbXGSB6R (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jul 2007 21:58:17 -0400 Message-ID: <469EC4E7.3060007@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 03:56:55 +0200 From: Rene Herman User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Mackall CC: Andrea Arcangeli , Alan Cox , Ray Lee , Bodo Eggert <7eggert@gmx.de>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Jesper Juhl , Linux Kernel Mailing List , William Lee Irwin III , David Chinner , Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC] 4K stacks default, not a debug thing any more...? References: <469BF104.1040703@gmail.com> <2c0942db0707161537o2852a308s26e79235e897e282@mail.gmail.com> <469BF768.6040200@gmail.com> <20070716230719.GC11115@waste.org> <469BFB73.3070105@gmail.com> <20070716232755.GD11115@waste.org> <20070719001539.GC29728@v2.random> <20070719013955.1bedc423@the-village.bc.nu> <20070719013358.GD29728@v2.random> <20070719013725.GP11115@waste.org> In-Reply-To: <20070719013725.GP11115@waste.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@home.nl for more information X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/19/2007 03:37 AM, Matt Mackall wrote: > Here's a way to make forward progress on this whole thing: > > Turn on irqstacks when using 8k stacks WLI: are you submitting? Makes great sense regardless of anything and they've been tested silly with 4KSTACKS already... > Detect when usage with 8k stacks would overrun a 4k stack when doing > our stack switch and do a WARN_ONCE Our stack switch? > Fix up the damn bugs DM ofcourse is fairly "layered-by-design" so I _hope_ they can be classified simple bugs... Rene.