The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
Cc: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: does CONFIG_UNUSED_SYMBOLS have any value anymore?
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 08:47:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <469F8784.3030700@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0707191133100.7047@localhost.localdomain>

Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> 
>> Stefan Richter wrote:
>>> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>> ...
>>>> it's not clear if that means that it was a *one-time* transition
>>>> aid which is now unnecessary, or whether it's an *ongoing* aid which
>>>> might be used at any time.  currently, there are no invocations of
>>>> EXPORT_UNUSED_SYMBOL[_GPL] anywhere in the tree.  so does that mean
>>>> this feature can be tossed?  or might it still be used every so often?
>> it's one of those pieces of infrastructure that get used from time
>> to time to phase out symbol exports... we should be more agressive
>> about that; about 1/3rd of the exports is not used by anything in
>> linux, yet each symbol costs about 100 bytes of memory at runtime.
> 
> ok, so maybe its removal file entry should be deleted if it's going to
> hang around.  your call.
> 

the removal entry is/was for the symbols *marked*, not for the 
infrastructure....

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-19 15:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-19 12:53 does CONFIG_UNUSED_SYMBOLS have any value anymore? Robert P. J. Day
2007-07-19 14:26 ` Stefan Richter
2007-07-19 14:45   ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-07-19 15:34     ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-07-19 15:47       ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2007-07-19 16:22         ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-07-19 15:32   ` Robert P. J. Day

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=469F8784.3030700@linux.intel.com \
    --to=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rpjday@mindspring.com \
    --cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox