From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933654AbXGTQ5s (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:57:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763013AbXGTQ4R (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:56:17 -0400 Received: from rzcomm12.rz.tu-bs.de ([134.169.9.59]:63781 "EHLO rzcomm12.rz.tu-bs.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758742AbXGTQ4P (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:56:15 -0400 Message-ID: <46A0C199.8050401@l4x.org> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:07:21 +0200 From: Jan Dittmer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5pre (Windows/20070717) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Mundt CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Trivial sh64 updates for 2.6.23-rc1 References: <20070720091707.GA26717@linux-sh.org> In-Reply-To: <20070720091707.GA26717@linux-sh.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paul Mundt wrote: > Paul Mundt (5): > sh64: Wire up fallocate() syscall. > sh64: Update cayman defconfig. > sh64: Fix up PCI section mismatch warnings. > sh64: Move entry point code to .text.head. > sh64: Flag sh64_get_page() as __init_refok. Tangential question. Which is the currently recommended cross toolchain for sh64? With "gcc 3.2 20020529", "binutils 020306 20030206" (some binary toolchain from ~2 years ago somewhere off the web) I get [1] CC fs/seq_file.o CC fs/xattr.o fs/xattr.c: In function `vfs_listxattr': fs/xattr.c:161: unrecognizable insn: (insn 162 159 114 (set (subreg:DI (reg:SI 181) 0) (reg:DI 182)) -1 (nil) (nil)) fs/xattr.c:161: Internal compiler error in get_attr_highpart, at insn-attrtab.c:6211 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See for instructions. make[2]: *** [fs/xattr.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [fs] Error 2 make: *** [_all] Error 2 gcc 3.4.x, 4.0.x, 4.1.x don't build for me from source (target -superh-linux-gnu, binutils 2.15.x or 2.17.x). Thanks, Jan [1] http://l4x.org/k/?d=32100