From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933207AbXGVX76 (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jul 2007 19:59:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759818AbXGVX7q (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jul 2007 19:59:46 -0400 Received: from osiris.atheme.org ([69.60.119.211]:49900 "EHLO osiris.atheme.org" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756192AbXGVX7p (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jul 2007 19:59:45 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 2008 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sun, 22 Jul 2007 19:59:45 EDT Message-ID: <46A3E7BA.6030609@partiallystapled.com> Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 19:26:50 -0400 From: Michael Tharp User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070619) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "H. Peter Anvin" CC: Git Mailing List , lkml Subject: Re: Git tree for old kernels from before the current tree References: <9e4733910707221349s462aa11bj714956f7cdc72aac@mail.gmail.com> <20070722211314.GA13850@linux-sh.org> <46A3D5EA.2050600@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <46A3D5EA.2050600@zytor.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 OpenPGP: id=94C1C841 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Wouldn't be hard to make a git tree with all the patches all the way > back to 0.01 even... It'd be delightful from a completeness standpoint (and I do love completeness), but considering it already takes a good 20 minutes to clone the 2.6 tree over a respectable cable connection, I'd have to object on the grounds of size. Now, if it was kept off in its own tree for people who don't mind ravaging kernel.org resources to satisfy their own curiosity, that's fine too. -- m. tharp