From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761410AbXGWGif (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 02:38:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757587AbXGWGi0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 02:38:26 -0400 Received: from rzcomm12.rz.tu-bs.de ([134.169.9.59]:56209 "EHLO rzcomm12.rz.tu-bs.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758065AbXGWGiZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Jul 2007 02:38:25 -0400 Message-ID: <46A44CD0.8020508@l4x.org> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 08:38:08 +0200 From: Jan Dittmer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5pre (Windows/20070717) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Mundt CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Trivial sh64 updates for 2.6.23-rc1 References: <20070720091707.GA26717@linux-sh.org> <46A0C199.8050401@l4x.org> <20070720151543.GA28274@linux-sh.org> <46A33D03.3000105@l4x.org> <20070722114253.GA11519@linux-sh.org> <46A3882C.7040709@l4x.org> <20070722204110.GA12101@linux-sh.org> In-Reply-To: <20070722204110.GA12101@linux-sh.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Paul Mundt wrote: > On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 06:39:08PM +0200, Jan Dittmer wrote: >> Paul Mundt wrote: >>> It's known that empty objects require explicit tuning for the ABI, >>> however, this has never been anything that was fatal. If you flip >>> something on within each of those subsystems, does the error go away? >> Yes, thanks this fixes it. Would you accept a patch to modify the >> defconfig so that it builds by default? Would be most useful for >> my pet project (http://l4x.org/k/). A fixed toolchain would of course >> also be nice. >> > I'll certainly apply patches that help getting it building, so feel free > to send updates for that. As I also noted, the empty object thing is > non-fatal with my toolchain, so I'd also appreciate it if you could put > a tarball of yours up somewhere so this is a bit easier to verify. I > suspect this is just something we're going to have to change in binutils, > however. You can find it here: http://l4x.org/~jdittmer/sh64-linux-binutils-2.17-gcc-4.1.3pre.tar.bz2 binutils 2.17.50.0.17 (from ftp.kernel.org) gcc 4.1.3 prerelease (svn, fixes a build bug for sh64) Jan