From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>,
Joel Schopp <jschopp@austin.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] update checkpatch.pl to version 0.08
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 16:08:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46A534EA.6030008@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <740c90243aaa6f6d4640d71230c4fa27@pinky>
Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> This version brings a number of new checks, and a number of bug
> fixes. Of note:
>
> - warnings for multiple assignments per line
This is bugged. e.g. the following line will hit this exception check:
int i = some_function(a, b, c);
> - warnings for multiple declarations per line
> - checks for single statement blocks with braces
>
> This patch includes an update for feature-removal-schedule.txt to
> better target checks.
>
> Andy Whitcroft (12):
> check for single statement braced blocks
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
> ---
>
> +# check for redundant bracing round if etc
> + if ($line =~ /\b(if|while|for|else)\b/) {
> + # Locate the end of the opening statement.
> + my @control = ctx_statement($linenr, $realcnt, 0);
> + my $nr = $linenr + (scalar(@control) - 1);
> + my $cnt = $realcnt - (scalar(@control) - 1);
> +
> + my $off = $realcnt - $cnt;
> + #print "$off: line<$line>end<" . $lines[$nr - 1] . ">\n";
> +
> + # If this is is a braced statement group check it
> + if ($lines[$nr - 1] =~ /{\s*$/) {
> + my ($lvl, @block) = ctx_block_level($nr, $cnt);
> +
> + my $stmt = join(' ', @block);
> + $stmt =~ s/^[^{]*{//;
> + $stmt =~ s/}[^}]*$//;
> +
> + #print "block<" . join(' ', @block) . "><" . scalar(@block) . ">\n";
> + #print "stmt<$stmt>\n\n";
> +
> + # Count the ;'s if there is fewer than two
> + # then there can only be one statement,
> + # if there is a brace inside we cannot
> + # trivially detect if its one statement.
> + # Also nested if's often require braces to
> + # disambiguate the else binding so shhh there.
> + my @semi = ($stmt =~ /;/g);
> + ##print "semi<" . scalar(@semi) . ">\n";
> + if ($lvl == 0 && scalar(@semi) < 2 &&
> + $stmt !~ /{/ && $stmt !~ /\bif\b/) {
> + my $herectx = "$here\n" . join("\n", @control, @block[1 .. $#block]) . "\n";
> + shift(@block);
> + ERROR("braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks\n" . $herectx);
This is a royal pain, since it now throws an ERROR for the obviously preferable
piece of code below:
if (err) {
do_something();
return -ERR;
} else {
do_somthing_else();
}
Also, CondingStyle explicitly permits this style (even encourages it):
---
Do not unnecessarily use braces where a single statement will do.
if (condition)
action();
This does not apply if one branch of a conditional statement is a single
statement. Use braces in both branches.
if (condition) {
do_this();
do_that();
} else {
otherwise();
}
---
So, IMO this test needs to go, unless the script becomes smart enough to know
that either side of the else requires braces. It's definately not an ERROR.
Cheers,
Auke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-23 23:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-15 8:25 [PATCH] update checkpatch.pl to version 0.08 Andy Whitcroft
2007-07-23 23:08 ` Kok, Auke [this message]
2007-07-24 0:11 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-07-24 9:06 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-07-24 9:15 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-24 11:19 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-07-24 13:08 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2007-07-24 16:51 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-07-24 17:20 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-07-24 17:46 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-07-24 18:03 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-07-24 18:30 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-07-24 17:22 ` Paul Mundt
2007-07-24 18:00 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-07-24 18:31 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-07-24 19:49 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-07-24 20:32 ` jschopp
2007-07-25 1:13 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-07-25 15:39 ` SL Baur
2007-07-25 16:54 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-07-24 18:45 ` jschopp
2007-07-24 19:59 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-07-24 20:53 ` jschopp
2007-07-23 23:13 ` Jesper Juhl
2007-07-23 23:36 ` Kok, Auke
2007-07-24 16:53 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-07-24 17:06 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-08-03 12:37 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-07-23 23:52 ` Kok, Auke
2007-07-24 11:33 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-07-24 11:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-24 11:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-07-24 16:56 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-07-24 18:38 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-07-24 13:58 ` jschopp
2007-07-24 14:33 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-07-24 14:50 ` Andy Whitcroft
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46A534EA.6030008@intel.com \
--to=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=apw@shadowen.org \
--cc=jschopp@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox