From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Agarwal,
Lomesh" <lomesh.agarwal@intel.com>,
Nigel Cunningham <nigel@nigel.suspend2.net>
Subject: Re: which signal is sent to freeze process?
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 20:48:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46A64984.1070808@colorfullife.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46A50AF0.70305@colorfullife.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1076 bytes --]
> Hi!
>
> Can you generate small testcase that demonstrates the problem?
>
> > Then what would be the correct way to handle resume process. The other
> > way of course is to make all the applications check the errno in case of
> > failure. But that seems more more problematic then system call checking.
> > What do you say?
>
> Hmm, does that testcase behave correctly over SIGSTOP/SIGCONT? I'm not
> saying kernel behaves nicely here, but perhaps fixing the apps to
> check errno properly is the right thing to do? :-)
Perhaps the kernel should use ERESTARTNOHAND instead of EINTR?
The current code is more than odd:
- select() and sys_ppoll() both use ERESTARTNOHAND (i.e.:
the functions do not return to user space with SIGSTOP/SIGCONT or freezer())
- sys_poll() uses EINTR (i.e.: SIGSTOP/SIGCONT/freezer() return to user space)
Attached is a patch that switches sys_poll to ERESTARTNOHAND and a poll test app.
Boot tested with FC6.
What do you think? With ERESTARTNOHAND, poll would only return to user space if the app has a SIGCONT handler installed.
--
Manfred
[-- Attachment #2: patch-poll-ERESTARTNOHAND --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 783 bytes --]
--- 2.6/fs/select.c 2007-05-20 09:52:32.000000000 +0200
+++ build-2.6/fs/select.c 2007-07-23 22:10:21.000000000 +0200
@@ -723,7 +723,7 @@
}
err = fdcount;
if (!fdcount && signal_pending(current))
- err = -EINTR;
+ err = -ERESTARTNOHAND;
out_fds:
walk = head;
while(walk!=NULL) {
@@ -794,7 +794,7 @@
ret = do_sys_poll(ufds, nfds, &timeout);
/* We can restart this syscall, usually */
- if (ret == -EINTR) {
+ if (ret == -ERESTARTNOHAND) {
/*
* Don't restore the signal mask yet. Let do_signal() deliver
* the signal on the way back to userspace, before the signal
@@ -805,7 +805,6 @@
sizeof(sigsaved));
set_thread_flag(TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK);
}
- ret = -ERESTARTNOHAND;
} else if (sigmask)
sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &sigsaved, NULL);
[-- Attachment #3: sp.cpp --]
[-- Type: text/x-c++src, Size: 789 bytes --]
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/poll.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
#include <sys/resource.h>
#include <errno.h>
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
int delay, ret;
struct pollfd pfd;
int pipesfd[2];
printf("sp <delay>\n");
if (argc != 2)
return 1;
delay = atoi(argv[1]);
printf("delay %d.\n", delay);
if (delay < 0 || delay > 1000)
return 2;
if (pipe(pipesfd) != 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "pipe failed with errno %d.\n", errno);
return 3;
}
pfd.fd = pipesfd[0];
pfd.events = POLLIN;
if (!fork()) {
sleep(delay);
write(pipesfd[1], "", 1);;
return 0;
}
sleep(1);
ret = poll(&pfd, 1, -1);
printf("poll returned %d.\n", ret);
if (pfd.revents)
printf(" events %8xh revents %8xh.\n", pfd.events, pfd.revents);
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-24 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-23 19:52 which signal is sent to freeze process? Manfred Spraul
2007-07-23 20:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-23 20:09 ` Manfred Spraul
2007-07-24 18:48 ` Manfred Spraul [this message]
2007-07-25 19:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-26 21:12 ` Agarwal, Lomesh
2007-07-31 7:55 ` Pavel Machek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-07-18 23:42 Agarwal, Lomesh
2007-07-19 2:18 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-07-19 4:09 ` Agarwal, Lomesh
2007-07-19 4:59 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-07-19 21:06 ` Agarwal, Lomesh
2007-07-19 22:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-19 22:19 ` Nigel Cunningham
2007-07-19 23:22 ` Agarwal, Lomesh
2007-07-20 11:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-20 18:07 ` Agarwal, Lomesh
2007-07-20 22:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-23 18:38 ` Agarwal, Lomesh
2007-07-23 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-23 19:31 ` Agarwal, Lomesh
2007-07-24 16:54 ` Pavel Machek
2007-07-23 20:57 ` Agarwal, Lomesh
2007-07-23 21:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-23 22:18 ` Agarwal, Lomesh
2007-07-24 9:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-19 22:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-07-25 13:41 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46A64984.1070808@colorfullife.com \
--to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lomesh.agarwal@intel.com \
--cc=nigel@nigel.suspend2.net \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox