From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933326AbXGYQD7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:03:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760871AbXGYQDv (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:03:51 -0400 Received: from smtpq3.groni1.gr.home.nl ([213.51.130.202]:39000 "EHLO smtpq3.groni1.gr.home.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751451AbXGYQDt (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:03:49 -0400 Message-ID: <46A773EA.5030103@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 18:01:46 +0200 From: Rene Herman User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070716) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kacper Wysocki CC: Ingo Molnar , david@lang.hm, Nick Piggin , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Ray Lee , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ck list , linux-mm@kvack.org, Paul Jackson , Andrew Morton , Jesper Juhl Subject: Re: howto get a patch merged (WAS: Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) References: <367a23780707250830i20a04a60n690e8da5630d39a9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <367a23780707250830i20a04a60n690e8da5630d39a9@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@home.nl for more information X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/25/2007 05:30 PM, Kacper Wysocki wrote: >>> main question is _why_ the hell it helps updatedb. > Is that what [ ... ] And there we go again -- off into blabber-land. Why does swap-prefetch help updatedb? Or doesn't it? And if it doesn't, why should anyone trust anything else someone who said it does says? Rene.