From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
To: Dave Johnson <djohnson+linux-kernel@sw.starentnetworks.com>
Cc: lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Srinivas Akkipeddi <sakkiped@starentnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCTP: IPv4 mapped addr not returned in SCTPv6 accept()
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:42:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46A8F926.1070606@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18088.61269.5608.925496@zeus.sw.starentnetworks.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2064 bytes --]
Dave Johnson wrote:
> Vlad Yasevich writes:
>> Can you explain why the sctp_v4 changes are need for the this case?
>> I don't see how the code in sctp/protocol.c comes into play for this
>> particular bug.
>
> connect() on v6 socket to v4 mapped address will trigger
> sctp_v4_to_sk_daddr:
>
> strace:
>
> socket(PF_INET6, SOCK_STREAM, 0x84 /* IPPROTO_??? */) = 3
> bind(3, {sa_family=AF_INET6, sin6_port=htons(0), inet_pton(AF_INET6, "::", &sin6_addr), sin6_flowinfo=0, sin6_scope_id=0}, 128) = 0
> connect(3, {sa_family=AF_INET6, sin6_port=htons(33333), inet_pton(AF_INET6, "::ffff:192.168.207.231", &sin6_addr), sin6_flowinfo=0, sin6_scope_id=0}, 128) = 0
> getsockname(3, {sa_family=AF_INET6, sin6_port=htons(32771), inet_pton(AF_INET6, "::ffff:192.168.207.234", &sin6_addr), sin6_flowinfo=0, sin6_scope_id=0}, [28]) = 0
> getpeername(3, {sa_family=AF_INET6, sin6_port=htons(33333), inet_pton(AF_INET6, "::ffff:192.168.207.231", &sin6_addr), sin6_flowinfo=0, sin6_scope_id=0}, [28]) = 0
>
> stack dump:
>
> [<f8c539de>] sctp_v4_to_sk_daddr+0x3e/0x80 [sctp]
> [<f8c5f6c4>] __sctp_connect+0x2a4/0x520 [sctp]
> [<f8c61810>] sctp_connect+0x60/0x70 [sctp]
> [<c02c4b2c>] inet_dgram_connect+0x4c/0x80
> [<c026dbab>] sys_connect+0x8b/0xd0
> [<c026e711>] sys_socketcall+0xb1/0x260
> [<c0103013>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
>
> I'm unsure if there is a path to call sctp_v4_to_sk_saddr() but it was
> added just to be complete.
>
> v4mapped in sctp_v4_create_accept_sk() probably isn't needed, but
> since v4mapped is in sctp_sock not sctp6_sock copying it seems like a
> good idea.
Ok. First, this is a different bug, so I would prefer a separate patch.
Also, I see the problem and it's ugly, but this solution is not really correct,
both conceptually and code wise.
Conceptually, the v4 code should never worry about V4-mapped addresses and shouldn't
muck with them. They are IPv6 addresses and there should be a clean separation.
Code wise, the code in the __sctp_connect() is terrible.
Does the attached patch work for you in this case.
Thanks
-vlad
[-- Attachment #2: connect_bug.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2544 bytes --]
diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
index b1917f6..1577814 100644
--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
@@ -977,7 +977,7 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* sk,
int err = 0;
int addrcnt = 0;
int walk_size = 0;
- union sctp_addr *sa_addr;
+ union sctp_addr *sa_addr = NULL;
void *addr_buf;
unsigned short port;
unsigned int f_flags = 0;
@@ -1011,7 +1011,10 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* sk,
goto out_free;
}
- err = sctp_verify_addr(sk, sa_addr, af->sockaddr_len);
+ /* Save current address so we can work with it */
+ memcpy(&to, sa_addr, af->sockaddr_len);
+
+ err = sctp_verify_addr(sk, &to, af->sockaddr_len);
if (err)
goto out_free;
@@ -1021,12 +1024,11 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* sk,
if (asoc && asoc->peer.port && asoc->peer.port != port)
goto out_free;
- memcpy(&to, sa_addr, af->sockaddr_len);
/* Check if there already is a matching association on the
* endpoint (other than the one created here).
*/
- asoc2 = sctp_endpoint_lookup_assoc(ep, sa_addr, &transport);
+ asoc2 = sctp_endpoint_lookup_assoc(ep, &to, &transport);
if (asoc2 && asoc2 != asoc) {
if (asoc2->state >= SCTP_STATE_ESTABLISHED)
err = -EISCONN;
@@ -1039,7 +1041,7 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* sk,
* make sure that there is no peeled-off association matching
* the peer address even on another socket.
*/
- if (sctp_endpoint_is_peeled_off(ep, sa_addr)) {
+ if (sctp_endpoint_is_peeled_off(ep, &to)) {
err = -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
goto out_free;
}
@@ -1070,7 +1072,7 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* sk,
}
}
- scope = sctp_scope(sa_addr);
+ scope = sctp_scope(&to);
asoc = sctp_association_new(ep, sk, scope, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!asoc) {
err = -ENOMEM;
@@ -1079,7 +1081,7 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* sk,
}
/* Prime the peer's transport structures. */
- transport = sctp_assoc_add_peer(asoc, sa_addr, GFP_KERNEL,
+ transport = sctp_assoc_add_peer(asoc, &to, GFP_KERNEL,
SCTP_UNKNOWN);
if (!transport) {
err = -ENOMEM;
@@ -1103,8 +1105,8 @@ static int __sctp_connect(struct sock* sk,
/* Initialize sk's dport and daddr for getpeername() */
inet_sk(sk)->dport = htons(asoc->peer.port);
- af = sctp_get_af_specific(to.sa.sa_family);
- af->to_sk_daddr(&to, sk);
+ af = sctp_get_af_specific(sa_addr->sa.sa_family);
+ af->to_sk_daddr(sa_addr, sk);
sk->sk_err = 0;
/* in-kernel sockets don't generally have a file allocated to them
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-26 19:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-25 23:49 [PATCH] SCTP: IPv4 mapped addr not returned in SCTPv6 accept() Dave Johnson
2007-07-26 17:55 ` Vlad Yasevich
2007-07-26 19:00 ` Dave Johnson
2007-07-26 19:42 ` Vlad Yasevich [this message]
2007-07-26 20:44 ` Dave Johnson
2007-07-26 20:49 ` Vlad Yasevich
2007-07-31 0:23 ` David Miller
2007-07-31 13:53 ` Vlad Yasevich
2007-08-06 20:48 ` [PATCH] SCTP: fix IPv4 addr in SCTPv6 accept()/getpeername() Dave Johnson
2007-08-06 20:48 ` [PATCH] SCTP: IPv4 mapped addr not returned in SCTPv6 accept() Dave Johnson
2007-08-06 20:55 ` Vlad Yasevich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46A8F926.1070606@hp.com \
--to=vladislav.yasevich@hp.com \
--cc=djohnson+linux-kernel@sw.starentnetworks.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lksctp-developers@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=sakkiped@starentnetworks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox