From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S938742AbXG1BuK (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:50:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1763328AbXG1Bt6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:49:58 -0400 Received: from shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net ([24.71.223.10]:61441 "EHLO pd2mo3so.prod.shaw.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760547AbXG1Bt5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:49:57 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:49:50 -0600 From: Robert Hancock Subject: Re: Problems with reading DVD using 2.6.21.5 In-reply-to: To: Manuel Reimer Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-id: <46AAA0BE.5030102@shaw.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (Windows/20070716) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Manuel Reimer wrote: > Hello, > > today I've tried to install Slackware 12.0 > > As the installer just "skipped" some install steps, I tried to find the > error. > > The problem seems to be unreadable parts on the DVD: > > http://pastebin.com/f381e8a88 > > But the DVD is OK. I've checked the MD5sum directly from disc on the > same system using the same DVD drive. > > dmesg says: > > http://pastebin.com/f63c5c389 > > The kernel, used on the Slackware setup disk, uses SMP, but my hardware > doesn't support this (get error on dmesg). May this (SMP kernel on > non-SMP system) cause such bugs? > > Is this a known bug? How could code, which breaks DVD access, get into > stable 2.6.21.5? I don't think this is a bug, the drive was told to read a sector and returned error SK=03, ASC=02, ASCQ=00 which is "NO SEEK COMPLETE", in other words it couldn't find that sector. Could be that the disc is marginally readable and only sometimes causes read errors. -- Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/