* [patch] sched: make cpu_clock() not use the rq clock
@ 2007-07-26 9:00 Ingo Molnar
2007-07-27 2:56 ` Eric St-Laurent
2007-07-29 6:03 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2007-07-26 9:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-kernel
Subject: sched: make cpu_clock() not use the rq clock
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
it is enough to disable interrupts to get the precise rq-clock
of the local CPU.
this also solves an NMI watchdog regression: the NMI watchdog
calls touch_softlockup_watchdog(), which might deadlock on
rq->lock if the NMI hits an rq-locked critical section.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
kernel/sched.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Index: linux-rt-rebase.q/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-rt-rebase.q.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-rt-rebase.q/kernel/sched.c
@@ -446,13 +446,12 @@ static inline unsigned long long rq_cloc
*/
unsigned long long cpu_clock(int cpu)
{
- struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
unsigned long long now;
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
- now = rq_clock(rq);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
+ local_irq_save(flags);
+ now = rq_clock(cpu_rq(cpu));
+ local_irq_restore(flags);
return now;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] sched: make cpu_clock() not use the rq clock
2007-07-26 9:00 [patch] sched: make cpu_clock() not use the rq clock Ingo Molnar
@ 2007-07-27 2:56 ` Eric St-Laurent
2007-07-29 6:03 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eric St-Laurent @ 2007-07-27 2:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel
On Thu, 2007-26-07 at 11:00 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Subject: sched: make cpu_clock() not use the rq clock
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>
> it is enough to disable interrupts to get the precise rq-clock
> of the local CPU.
Hi Ingo,
Those new fast nanoseconds resolution clock APIs are nice but it seems
to me that their naming and _where_ they are implemented in the tree is
a little odd, IMO.
We have:
1. sched_clock() is in kernel/sched.c (weak implementation)
2. sched_clock() is in arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c (architecture override)
3. rq_clock() is in kernel/sched.c
4. cpu_clock() is in kernel/sched.c
I would suggest:
1. rename sched_clock() (remove sched_ as it's not sched specific
anymore) and place it in kernel/time/...
2. rename the architecture specific version of it too
This first function is the basic fast ns clock
3. base your rq_clock() on cpu_clock() (#4) or use the later directly.
This is local to sched.c
4. move cpu_clock() in kernel/time/...
This the per-cpu monotonic version.
See my point? Base the scheduler clock from a general kernel API, not
the other way around.
Just a suggestion.
Best regards,
- Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] sched: make cpu_clock() not use the rq clock
2007-07-26 9:00 [patch] sched: make cpu_clock() not use the rq clock Ingo Molnar
2007-07-27 2:56 ` Eric St-Laurent
@ 2007-07-29 6:03 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-29 21:17 ` Ingo Molnar
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge @ 2007-07-29 6:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Subject: sched: make cpu_clock() not use the rq clock
>
This subject doesn't make much sense to me. All this patch does is get
the rq's current time under irq_disable rather than spinlock, right?
J
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>
> it is enough to disable interrupts to get the precise rq-clock
> of the local CPU.
>
> this also solves an NMI watchdog regression: the NMI watchdog
> calls touch_softlockup_watchdog(), which might deadlock on
> rq->lock if the NMI hits an rq-locked critical section.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> ---
> kernel/sched.c | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-rt-rebase.q/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-rt-rebase.q.orig/kernel/sched.c
> +++ linux-rt-rebase.q/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -446,13 +446,12 @@ static inline unsigned long long rq_cloc
> */
> unsigned long long cpu_clock(int cpu)
> {
> - struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> unsigned long long now;
> unsigned long flags;
>
> - spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
> - now = rq_clock(rq);
> - spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> + now = rq_clock(cpu_rq(cpu));
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
>
> return now;
> }
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] sched: make cpu_clock() not use the rq clock
2007-07-29 6:03 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
@ 2007-07-29 21:17 ` Ingo Molnar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2007-07-29 21:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge; +Cc: Andrew Morton, linux-kernel
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Subject: sched: make cpu_clock() not use the rq clock
> >
>
> This subject doesn't make much sense to me. All this patch does is get
> the rq's current time under irq_disable rather than spinlock, right?
i typoed it: s/clock/lock
Ingo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-07-29 21:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-26 9:00 [patch] sched: make cpu_clock() not use the rq clock Ingo Molnar
2007-07-27 2:56 ` Eric St-Laurent
2007-07-29 6:03 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-29 21:17 ` Ingo Molnar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox