From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762952AbXG2Nrz (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 09:47:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762292AbXG2Nrs (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 09:47:48 -0400 Received: from il.qumranet.com ([82.166.9.18]:35053 "EHLO il.qumranet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757831AbXG2Nrr (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 09:47:47 -0400 Message-ID: <46AC9A8D.8060003@qumranet.com> Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 16:47:57 +0300 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070419) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alistair John Strachan CC: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.23-rc1, KVM-AMD problem References: <200707281855.41277.alistair@devzero.co.uk> <200707291229.49155.alistair@devzero.co.uk> <46AC7B44.1040509@qumranet.com> <200707291444.18024.alistair@devzero.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <200707291444.18024.alistair@devzero.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alistair John Strachan wrote: > On Sunday 29 July 2007 12:34:28 you wrote: > [snip] > >>> Doesn't help, I still get the same crashes. I tried 2.6.22 again and it's >>> rock solid by comparison. >>> >> Do you mean, kvm-33 on top of 2.6.22, or the kvm modules from 2.6.22? >> Please describe your configuration *exactly*. >> > > I'm using the kvm-33 *userspace* package (based on Debian's kvm-28 packaging) > and 2.6.23-rc1's KVM modules. I patched 2.6.23-rc1 with the patch you > provided in your last email. So I'm not using -git HEAD. > > Maybe there's been additional necessary fixes to -git requiring me to update > to HEAD? That wasn't clear from your last email. > No, that patch is the only potential fix post -rc1. There are a few other fixes there, but they are intended to avoid guest crashes, not host crashes. What guest are you running? Maybe I can reproduce it here. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function