From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S939264AbXG3Q6m (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:58:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S936408AbXG3Q6d (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:58:33 -0400 Received: from CPE0050fc332afc-CM00407b861c34.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com ([74.120.60.167]:53454 "EHLO nk-1124.localdomain" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764437AbXG3Q6c (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:58:32 -0400 Message-ID: <46AE18AE.50305@tigershaunt.com> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:58:22 -0400 From: Rashkae User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060913) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com CC: Matthew Hawkins , ck@vds.kolivas.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1) References: <1185536610.502.8.camel@localhost> <20070729170641.GA26220@elte.hu> <930f95dc0707291154j102494d9m58f4cc452c7ff17c@mail.gmail.com> <20070729204716.GB1578@elte.hu> <930f95dc0707291431j4e50214di3c01cd44b5597502@mail.gmail.com> <20070730114649.GB19186@elte.hu> <1185814243.7377.2.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1185814243.7377.2.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > > Do we care ? The code should be replaced with ptep_get_and_clear + > pte_modify anyway.. > Since the general direction of this thread was for people to test 3D game performance with the shiny new CFS cpu scheduler, I would say yes, we do care if people with the only 2 types of gaming caliber Video cards can get said video cards working, right now, with said shiny new kernel. Yes yes, I know, kernel devs don't care if they break binary drivers... and in principle, I agree with that philosophy.. but it's still damn inconvenient at times :)