From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S967396AbXG3RLf (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:11:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S967098AbXG3RJx (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:09:53 -0400 Received: from kai.krose.org ([140.186.190.96]:40736 "EHLO kai.krose.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966163AbXG3RJw (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:09:52 -0400 Message-ID: <46AE1B5F.8060705@krose.org> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:09:51 -0400 From: Kyle Rose User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [ck] Re: SD still better than CFS for 3d ?(was Re: 2.6.23-rc1) References: <1185536610.502.8.camel@localhost> <20070729170641.GA26220@elte.hu> <930f95dc0707291154j102494d9m58f4cc452c7ff17c@mail.gmail.com> <20070729204716.GB1578@elte.hu> <930f95dc0707291431j4e50214di3c01cd44b5597502@mail.gmail.com> <20070730114649.GB19186@elte.hu> <1185814234.16771.1.camel@lappy> In-Reply-To: <1185814234.16771.1.camel@lappy> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > As for breaking binary crap, thats a bonus. Break them hard, break them > often. > I think there's a big difference in philosophy between "break binary drivers if you want to make a legitimate change for whatever reason" and "break binary drivers just to be a pain in the ass to the developers and users of said drivers." I think most people here agree with the first. It's unclear to me how many here agree with the second, but I know it's at least one. ;-) Kyle