From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S968420AbXG3UDa (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:03:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S966993AbXG3UDF (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:03:05 -0400 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:55768 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S967738AbXG3UDE (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:03:04 -0400 Message-ID: <46AE43F5.8070802@garzik.org> Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:03:01 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yoann Padioleau CC: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] dev->priv to netdev_priv(dev), drivers/net/tokenring/ References: <87r6mzmf6q.fsf@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <87r6mzmf6q.fsf@wanadoo.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.1.9 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.3 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Yoann Padioleau wrote: > Replacing accesses to dev->priv to netdev_priv(dev). The replacment > is safe when netdev_priv is used to access a private structure that is > right next to the net_device structure in memory. > Cf http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.development.system/browse_thread/thread/de19321bcd94dbb8/0d74a4adcd6177bd > This is the case when the net_device structure was allocated with > a call to alloc_netdev or one of its derivative. > > Here is an excerpt of the semantic patch that performs the transformation > > @ rule1 @ > type T; > struct net_device *dev; > @@ > > dev = > ( > alloc_netdev > | > alloc_etherdev > | > alloc_trdev > ) > (sizeof(T), ...) > > @ rule1bis @ > struct net_device *dev; > expression E; > @@ > dev->priv = E > > @ rule2 depends on rule1 && !rule1bis @ > struct net_device *dev; > type rule1.T; > @@ > > - (T*) dev->priv > + netdev_priv(dev) > > > PS: I have performed the same transformation on the whole kernel > and it affects around 70 files, most of them in drivers/net/. > Should I split my patch for each subnet directories ? (wireless/, wan/, etc) applied. splitting up by sub-directory would be helpful.