From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760034AbXGaMqT (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2007 08:46:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757473AbXGaMqM (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2007 08:46:12 -0400 Received: from hellhawk.shadowen.org ([80.68.90.175]:4553 "EHLO hellhawk.shadowen.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755285AbXGaMqL (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2007 08:46:11 -0400 Message-ID: <46AF2F10.40001@shadowen.org> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 13:46:08 +0100 From: Andy Whitcroft User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.9 (X11/20061220) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Wessel CC: lkml , rdunlap@xenotime.net, jschopp@austin.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Check patch reports multiple var with a function assignment References: <46AEA245.9090300@windriver.com> In-Reply-To: <46AEA245.9090300@windriver.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jason Wessel wrote: > Running checkpatch.pl products an warning when it should not. I believe > it can be fixed by adding to the regular expression, but feel free to > fix it another way as I may not know all the cases this is trying to catch. Thanks for the patch. We had already caught this one and the test itself now is likely to be shelved, a new release with this update in is iminent. -apw