From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762207AbXGaNYu (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2007 09:24:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760223AbXGaNY0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2007 09:24:26 -0400 Received: from qb-out-0506.google.com ([72.14.204.239]:12476 "EHLO qb-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760035AbXGaNYZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2007 09:24:25 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CdQfbMy3T/QiwICnwtSfJKei9WmU2bJ3J8RRRXPRalbnwYUBSa5lnJFFmkR83gAYRcNpFgiYLPtUe2ukfOAna1wff9liXPGdXEaXGvh7YvEptV1vQ2EtU7xSZieiM58pUeNI7/RNf6718ZxoFc+d2ySoSGkpNkUM7+lDMWyvh3k= Message-ID: <46AF3803.1010308@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 22:24:19 +0900 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.10 (X11/20070307) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cornelia Huck CC: ebiederm@xmission.com, gregkh@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, satyam@infradead.org, stern@rowland.harvard.edu Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 2.6.23-rc1] sysfs: locking fix and cleanups References: <11858769082982-git-send-email-htejun@gmail.com> <20070731145506.3c7d4a40@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20070731145506.3c7d4a40@gondolin.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 19:15:08 +0900, > Tejun Heo wrote: > >> Hello, all. >> >> This patchset contains a locking fix and cleanup patches for sysfs. >> >> #01 locking fix >> #02 shadow support removal from Eric adapted to apply after #01 >> #03-07 clean up patches >> >> #01 should go mainline as it fixes a locking regression introduced by >> -rc1 merge. The rest should stay in -gregkh till 24 merge window >> opens up. >> >> Clean up patches don't introduce any noticeable behavior change. They >> just refactor and simplify codes. >> >> Thanks. > > FYI: This seems to work well on s390 so far, when attaching/detaching > and moving devices (my standard test cases ;) Thanks a lot for testing as always. :-) -- tejun