From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755531AbXHBDBR (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 23:01:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753432AbXHBDBG (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 23:01:06 -0400 Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com ([209.85.146.183]:25274 "EHLO wa-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751449AbXHBDBF (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Aug 2007 23:01:05 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HZQWCACbws2TD39PqUUhDFDBKYdMUOPmfST0ReQUUBHZipSCqeZ40ZjX9YNMwr8wvfehHk4YHRFTB+RqD33rj08dd/1O2F2sYwTvXjinJ4qHrGqvL63JZrn7kLUvxWJWWVj6M//2xWNF5OWR53YMW4k2Pm5HAHcrJAsx6D1HobI= Message-ID: <46B148AB.4020401@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 11:59:55 +0900 From: Tejun Heo User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070716) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neil Brown CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 026 of 35] Split any large bios that arrive at __make_request. References: <20070731112539.22428.patches@notabene> <1070731021804.25499@suse.de> <20070801175636.GJ13674@htj.dyndns.org> <18097.10790.205449.176104@notabene.brown> In-Reply-To: <18097.10790.205449.176104@notabene.brown> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Neil Brown wrote: > On Thursday August 2, htejun@gmail.com wrote: >> Hmmm... Patches don't apply beyond this one. I'm applying against >> clean 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 grabbed using ketchup. >> > > So do you mean 027 doesn't apply, or that 028 doesn't apply next? > > It is possible that you missed 027. It originally has 3 consecutive > Xs in the subject line, so vger.kernel.org bounced it. > I re-sent it, but it would have had a different References header and > the might not appear in the same thread. > > If you confirm that 027 isn't applying, I'll track down what happened. You're right. I don't have patch 27. Looking.... Ummm... It's not in my LKML folder either. Can you resend it? Thanks. -- tejun