public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Roehricht <ml@felicis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Scheduling the highest priority task
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 10:58:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46B19CA1.7050204@felicis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8KLFD-G9-5@gated-at.bofh.it>

Hi,

perhaps someone can give me a hint what I should consider to look for in 
order to change the ("old" 2.6.21) scheduler such that it schedules the 
highest priority task of a given runqueue.
Given a multiprocessor system I currently observe that whenever there 
are two tasks on one CPU, the lower priority one is migrated to another 
CPU. But I don't realize why this happens. From looking at the source 
code I thought it should be the highest priority one (lowest bit set in 
the runqueue's bitmap) according to
	idx = sched_find_first_bit(array->bitmap);
within move_tasks(). The idx value is then used as an index (surprise) 
to the linked list of tasks of this particular priority and one task is 
picked:
	head = array->queue + idx;
         curr = head->prev;
         tmp = list_entry(curr, struct task_struct, run_list);

Is my assumption wrong? Using printk()s within this code section makes 
the system just hang completely quite soon. The schedstats do not notify 
me immediately. So I am a bit lost on how to track down or trace the 
problem.

Can anybody confirm that my observations are correct that the scheduler 
picks the lowest priority job of a runqueue for migration?
What needs to be changed in order to pick the highest priority one?

Martin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-08-02  8:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <8KLFD-G9-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
2007-07-25 15:18 ` highest and lowest priority job of a runqueue Martin Roehricht
2007-08-02  8:58 ` Martin Roehricht [this message]
2007-08-02 11:40   ` Scheduling the highest priority task Ingo Molnar
2007-08-02 15:00     ` Martin Roehricht
2007-08-02 15:03       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-02 15:14         ` Martin Roehricht
2007-08-02 15:19           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-02 15:46             ` Martin Roehricht
2007-08-02 19:48               ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-02 21:05                 ` Martin Roehricht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46B19CA1.7050204@felicis.org \
    --to=ml@felicis.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox