public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "T. J. Brumfield" <enderandrew@gmail.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: about modularization
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 19:47:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46B36A43.6030101@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070803131900.GA26203@elte.hu>

On 08/03/2007 03:19 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> One of the authors of the IO scheduler code said it on lkml recently that
> while modularization of IO scheduler had advantages too, in retrospect he
> wishes they would not have made IO schedulers modular and now that
> decision cannot be undone.

Just as a matter of interest -- why can't it? (a pointer to a list archive 
if you have one, or a name so I can look for it myself if you don't, will do 
as answer).

Rene.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-08-03 17:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-03 12:07 Scheduler Situation T. J. Brumfield
2007-08-03 12:31 ` Alistair John Strachan
2007-08-03 12:52 ` Oleksandr Natalenko
     [not found]   ` <192840a00708030616g22d9dd16o95b2620bfe3347a8@mail.gmail.com>
2007-08-03 13:27     ` Андрій Мішковський
2007-08-03 13:45       ` Alistair John Strachan
2007-08-03 13:00 ` debian developer
2007-08-03 15:28   ` about modularization Ingo Molnar
2007-08-03 13:19 ` Ingo Molnar
     [not found]   ` <cdc89fe60708030651s54b5f0e0j938450632cf621c5@mail.gmail.com>
2007-08-03 13:52     ` Fwd: " T. J. Brumfield
2007-08-03 15:02       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-03 15:13       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-08-03 17:47   ` Rene Herman [this message]
2007-08-03 18:59     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-01 22:02   ` Oleg Verych
     [not found] ` <200708031354.15485.alistair@devzero.co.uk>
     [not found]   ` <cdc89fe60708030712q391de609o3999a870ea7cbcbd@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]     ` <200708031540.29687.alistair@devzero.co.uk>
2007-08-03 14:51       ` Scheduler Situation T. J. Brumfield
2007-08-03 15:05         ` Alistair John Strachan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-08-06 20:20 about modularization Mitchell Erblich
2007-08-06 20:50 ` Rene Herman
2007-08-06 21:48 Mitchell Erblich
2007-08-06 23:35 ` Rene Herman
2007-08-06 23:45   ` Rene Herman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46B36A43.6030101@gmail.com \
    --to=rene.herman@gmail.com \
    --cc=enderandrew@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox