From: Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@bull.net>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/2][KVM] guest time accounting
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:13:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46C012A8.2040908@bull.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46C00FC1.1070306@qumranet.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2037 bytes --]
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> The aim of these two patches is to measure the CPU time used by a virtual
>> machine. All comments are welcome... I'm not sure it's the good way to
>> do that.
>>
>> [PATCH 1/2] introduce a new field, "guest", in cpustat to store the
>> time used by
>> the CPU to run virtual CPU. Modify /proc/stat to display this new field.
>>
>> [PATCH 2/2] modify account_system_time() to add cputime to
>> cpustat->guest if we
>> are running a VCPU. We add this cputime to cpustat->user instead of
>> cpustat->system because this part of KVM code is in fact user code
>> although it
>> is executed in the kernel. We duplicate VCPU time between guest and
>> user to
>> allow an unmodified "top(1)" to display correct value. A modified
>> "top(1)" is
>> able to display good cpu user time and cpu guest time by subtracting
>> cpu guest
>> time from cpu user time.
>>
>
> [copying Ingo and Rusty]
>
> The patches look good. A couple of comments:
>
> - perhaps the new fields should be guarded by a #ifdef CONFIG_HYPERVISOR
> (selected by CONFIG_KVM)? that way the (minor) additional overhead is
> only incurred if it can possibly be used. I imagine that our canine
> cousin will want to use this as well.
There is also a CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION and a CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING (from
s390 and powerpc) Which one to use ?
I'm wondering if we can have a more accurate accounting:
- For the moment we add all system time since the previous entering to the VCPU
to the guest time (and I guess there is some real system time in it ???)
- Perhaps we can sum nanoseconds spent in the VCPU and add it to cpustat when
these ns are greater than 1 ms ? (I'm trying to make something in this way)
> - I think that there is per-task accounting of user time and system
> time; that should be extended as well.
it should be easy to do too...
Laurent
--
------------- Laurent.Vivier@bull.net --------------
"Software is hard" - Donald Knuth
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-13 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-10 15:58 [PATCH 0/2][KVM] guest time accounting Laurent Vivier
2007-08-13 8:01 ` [kvm-devel] " Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 8:13 ` Laurent Vivier [this message]
2007-08-13 8:38 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 13:08 ` Laurent Vivier
2007-08-13 13:22 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 14:15 ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-13 14:19 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 14:26 ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-13 14:37 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 20:40 ` Heiko Carstens
2007-08-19 9:32 ` List stripping out cc's (was: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/2][KVM] guest time accounting) Avi Kivity
2007-08-19 19:53 ` List stripping out cc's Jeff Garzik
2007-08-19 20:10 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 14:05 ` [kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/2][KVM] guest time accounting Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-13 14:10 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 14:22 ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-13 14:22 ` Laurent Vivier
2007-08-13 14:30 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 14:41 ` Laurent Vivier
2007-08-13 15:22 ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-13 15:36 ` Laurent Vivier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46C012A8.2040908@bull.net \
--to=laurent.vivier@bull.net \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox