* Withdrawn for now: /drivers/char/* /drivers/net/* drivers/atm/* ioremap balancing/ returncode check
@ 2007-08-13 14:09 Scott Thompson
2007-08-13 16:00 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Scott Thompson @ 2007-08-13 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alan; +Cc: linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:21:03 -0400 Alan Cox
<alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
the patch itself appears to be wrapped and
>mangled
>and is not suitable for application.
I just verified that several patches I've submitted since 8/10 hit
this same issue due to *some* recent change on the server side of
my mail client.
Will resubmit after resolving issue w/ mail provider...
---------------------------------------
Scott Thompson / postfail@hushmail.com
---------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Withdrawn for now: /drivers/char/* /drivers/net/* drivers/atm/* ioremap balancing/ returncode check
2007-08-13 14:09 Withdrawn for now: /drivers/char/* /drivers/net/* drivers/atm/* ioremap balancing/ returncode check Scott Thompson
@ 2007-08-13 16:00 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2007-08-13 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: postfail; +Cc: alan, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
Scott Thompson wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:21:03 -0400 Alan Cox
> <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> the patch itself appears to be wrapped and
>> mangled
>> and is not suitable for application.
>
> I just verified that several patches I've submitted since 8/10 hit
> this same issue due to *some* recent change on the server side of
> my mail client.
>
> Will resubmit after resolving issue w/ mail provider...
It's highly unlikely that the server side would wrap email.
Jeff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Withdrawn for now: /drivers/char/* /drivers/net/* drivers/atm/* ioremap balancing/ returncode check
@ 2007-08-14 3:48 Scott Thompson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Scott Thompson @ 2007-08-14 3:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jeff; +Cc: linux-kernel, kernel-janitors
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 12:00:28 -0400 Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
wrote:
>
>It's highly unlikely that the server side would wrap email.
>
> Jeff
Heard back from hushmail support --
"Outgoing mail is currently wrapping at 68 characters for new mail,
and
64 chars for replies. This is to ensure that digital signatures
retain
the correct format for the recipient to be able to verify."
.... and no way to change from w/in any hushmail client. just
attempted similar thing with a yahoo account and was able to
resolve this issue, so all hushmail users can be warned that
wordwrapping will be an issue on patch submission and another route
will be required.
---------------------------------------
Scott Thompson / postfail@hushmail.com
---------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-08-14 3:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-08-13 14:09 Withdrawn for now: /drivers/char/* /drivers/net/* drivers/atm/* ioremap balancing/ returncode check Scott Thompson
2007-08-13 16:00 ` Jeff Garzik
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-08-14 3:48 Scott Thompson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox