From: "Markus Rechberger" <markus.rechberger@amd.com>
To: "Marcel Holtmann" <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Jean Delvare" <khali@linux-fr.org>,
"Greg KH" <greg@kroah.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Firmware class name collision
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:20:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46C092EB.1070501@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1187025047.6698.219.camel@violet>
Hi Marcel,
Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Markus,
>
>
>> following patch fixes the i2c name collision with i2c-dev.
>>
>> http://mcentral.de/wiki/index.php/Bugtracker#i2c_core_problem
>>
>> This issue has been experienced with em28xx and saa7133 based devices.
>> I discussed that problem with Jean Delvare a while ago and he proposed
>> to add a prefix to the class name.
>>
>> http://mcentral.de/~mrec/patches/firmware_class_name_collision.diff
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Rechberger <markus.rechberger@amd.com>
>>
>> index b24efd4..bfc54a1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
>> @@ -297,8 +297,7 @@ firmware_class_timeout(u_long data)
>>
>> static inline void fw_setup_device_id(struct device *f_dev, struct
>> device *dev)
>> {
>> - /* XXX warning we should watch out for name collisions */
>> - strlcpy(f_dev->bus_id, dev->bus_id, BUS_ID_SIZE);
>> + snprintf(f_dev->bus_id, BUS_ID_SIZE, "fw-%s", dev->bus_id);
>> }
>>
>
> I would prefer if we use "firmware-%s" since the "fw" might collide with
> the new Firewire stack. Please change that and I agree.
>
>
firmware-%s sounds more informative and cannot be mistaken with firewire
yes.
Signed-off-by: Markus Rechberger <markus.rechberger@amd.com>
http://mcentral.de/~mrec/patches/firmware_class_name_collision_2.diff
diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
index b24efd4..bfc54a1 100644
--- a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
+++ b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
@@ -297,8 +297,7 @@ firmware_class_timeout(u_long data)
static inline void fw_setup_device_id(struct device *f_dev, struct
device *dev)
{
- /* XXX warning we should watch out for name collisions */
- strlcpy(f_dev->bus_id, dev->bus_id, BUS_ID_SIZE);
+ snprintf(f_dev->bus_id, BUS_ID_SIZE, "firmware-%s", dev->bus_id);
}
static int fw_register_device(struct device **dev_p, const char *fw_name,
> Acked-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
>
> Regards
>
> Marcel
>
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-13 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-13 13:11 [PATCH] Firmware class name collision Markus Rechberger
2007-08-13 13:22 ` Jean Delvare
2007-08-13 17:10 ` Marcel Holtmann
2007-08-13 17:20 ` Markus Rechberger [this message]
2007-08-13 17:45 ` Marcel Holtmann
2007-08-14 13:33 ` Jean Delvare
2007-08-14 14:17 ` Kay Sievers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46C092EB.1070501@amd.com \
--to=markus.rechberger@amd.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox