From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S974661AbXHMTBW (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:01:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933568AbXHMTAy (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:00:54 -0400 Received: from rgminet01.oracle.com ([148.87.113.118]:27968 "EHLO rgminet01.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755399AbXHMTAw (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:00:52 -0400 Message-ID: <46C0AB7E.9050001@oracle.com> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 12:05:34 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Bunk CC: lkml , akpm , sam@ravnborg.org, zippel@linux-m68k.org, vincent.legoll@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] kconfig: update kconfig-language text References: <20070813113809.9a715e75.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20070813185431.GD18945@stusta.de> In-Reply-To: <20070813185431.GD18945@stusta.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAAAI= X-Whitelist: TRUE X-Whitelist: TRUE Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 11:38:09AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> From: Randy Dunlap >> >> Add kconfig-language docs for mainmenu, def_bool[ean], >> and def_tristate. >> >> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap >> Signed-off-by: Vincent Legoll >> --- >> Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt | 12 ++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) >> >> --- linux-2.6.23-rc3.orig/Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt >> +++ linux-2.6.23-rc3/Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.txt >> @@ -77,6 +77,11 @@ applicable everywhere (see syntax). >> Optionally, dependencies only for this default value can be added with >> "if". >> >> +- type definition + default value: >> + "def_bool"/"def_boolean"/"def_tristate" ["if" ] >> ... > > Should the redundant and unused def_boolean be documented or removed? > > I'd prefer the latter. I don't see a problem with it. At any rate, I'm documenting the current state of the source code... Get it removed and this doc can be changed. -- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***