From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
To: postfail@hushmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1 of 5 ] /drivers/char ioremap balancing/ returncode check
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 21:36:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46C355AC.3040604@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070815043503.535662281F@mailserver9.hushmail.com>
Scott Thompson napsal(a):
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 16:17:29 -0400 Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/char/sx.c b/drivers/char/sx.c
>>> index 85a2328..30829ed 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/char/sx.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/char/sx.c
>>> @@ -2627,6 +2627,12 @@ static void __devinit fix_sx_pci(struct
>>> pci_dev *pdev, struct sx_board *board)
>>> pci_read_config_dword(pdev, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0, &hwbase);
>>> hwbase &= PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_MEM_MASK;
>>> rebase = ioremap(hwbase, 0x80);
>>> + if (!rebase) {
>>> + printk(KERN_DEBUG
>>> + "sx:ioremap fail, unable to perform cntrl reg fix\n");
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> +
>> 1) this should be pci_iomap(pdev, 0, 0x80)
> The ioremap call was there before my patch and I'm just trying to
> audit ioremap calls to make sure that they are cleaned up and have
> their return codes checked. If you want me to take care of that
> "while I'm in the neighborhood", let me know, but trying to avoid
> too much scope creep on my audit to increase chances it actually
> gets included...
Yup, while you are at it, make yet another patch, which will convert this to
pci_iomap/unmap.
>
>> 2) KERN_DEBUG is inappropriate and wrap the string in the middle
>> and not in the
>> beginning
>
> Agree on the wordwrap, several artifacts were created on this
> patchset and this whole thing will be resubmitted through a
> different mail client.
Aha. Anyways, if it's more that 80 columns in width, split it into more lines.
> As for KERN_DEBUG, KERN_DEBUG is used in the function following
> this call as notification that this workaround was required. When
> I audit code as I am here I generally try to blend the patch in
> with the style and conventions of the code around it. If
> KERN_DEBUG is inappropriate on the subsequent call, both values
> should be changed.
Only a string, where you warn an user, that something went wrong and this and
over that won't work... KERN_DEBUG messages are usually NOT logged. I suggest
KERN_ERR for mapping failure and KERN_INFO for the message about the workaround
is being used.
--
Jiri Slaby (jirislaby@gmail.com)
Faculty of Informatics, Masaryk University
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-15 19:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-15 4:35 [PATCH 1 of 5 ] /drivers/char ioremap balancing/ returncode check Scott Thompson
2007-08-15 19:36 ` Jiri Slaby [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-08-13 4:00 Scott Thompson
2007-08-13 20:17 ` Jiri Slaby
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46C355AC.3040604@gmail.com \
--to=jirislaby@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=postfail@hushmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox