From: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
To: Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@bull.net>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
kvm-devel <kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH/RFC 3/4]Introduce "account modifiers" mechanism
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2007 10:55:52 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46C94908.5080008@qumranet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46C94306.8080300@bull.net>
Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>
>> Where did CONFIG_GUEST_ACCOUNTING go?
>>
>>
>
> Lost in the sea ...
>
> Actually, I thought this modification is not enough expensive (in time and
> space) to justify a CONFIG_*. But if you think so I can add this in init/Kconfig.
>
>
The difference between "convince everyone that it isn't expensive,
including the embedded guys" and preemptively adding a config option can
be quite large...
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-20 7:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <46C4719A.2060308@bull.net>
2007-08-16 15:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/4]Introduce a new field "guest" in cpustat Laurent Vivier
[not found] ` <46C4720F.7030304@bull.net>
2007-08-16 15:57 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/4]Introduce a new field "guest" in task_struct Laurent Vivier
[not found] ` <46C4725A.4070607@bull.net>
2007-08-16 15:58 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/4]Introduce "account modifiers" mechanism Laurent Vivier
2007-08-16 22:39 ` Rusty Russell
2007-08-17 7:35 ` Laurent Vivier
2007-08-17 8:30 ` Rusty Russell
2007-08-17 9:16 ` Laurent Vivier
2007-08-17 11:51 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/4, second shot]Introduce "account_guest_time" Laurent Vivier
2007-08-17 11:54 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/4, second shot]KVM uses "account_guest_time()" Laurent Vivier
2007-08-17 13:03 ` [kvm-devel] " Avi Kivity
2007-08-17 13:16 ` Laurent Vivier
2007-08-19 7:39 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-17 12:59 ` [kvm-devel] [PATCH/RFC 3/4, second shot]Introduce "account_guest_time" Avi Kivity
2007-08-17 12:55 ` [kvm-devel] [PATCH/RFC 3/4]Introduce "account modifiers" mechanism Avi Kivity
2007-08-17 13:08 ` Laurent Vivier
2007-08-17 13:32 ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-19 7:41 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-17 14:12 ` Laurent Vivier
2007-08-19 7:38 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-20 7:30 ` Laurent Vivier
2007-08-20 7:55 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
[not found] ` <46C472D2.7000702@bull.net>
2007-08-16 15:59 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/4]Modify KVM to use the "account modifiers" Laurent Vivier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46C94908.5080008@qumranet.com \
--to=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=Laurent.Vivier@bull.net \
--cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox