public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@argo.co.il>
To: Gerald Britton <gbritton@doomcom.org>
Cc: Michael Smith <msmith@xiph.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Wingo <wingo@fluendo.com>
Subject: Re: gettimeofday() jumping into the future
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:03:40 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46CD85AC.7050805@argo.co.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070823113648.GA5405@zante.sekrit.org>

Gerald Britton wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 01:08:27PM +0200, Michael Smith wrote:
>   
>> Hi,
>>
>> We've been seeing some strange behaviour on some of our applications
>> recently. I've tracked this down to gettimeofday() returning spurious
>> values occasionally.
>>
>> Specifically, gettimeofday() will suddenly, for a single call, return
>> a value about 4398 seconds (~1 hour 13 minutes) in the future. The
>> following call goes back to a normal value.
>>     
>
> I have seen this as well (on a 2.6.20.4 kernel).  The value returned was
> always identical each time the glitch occured (just a little over 4398
> seconds).  I saw it watching packet receive timestamps and on the system in
> question, it would generally hit this problem around once a minute.  When
> moving forward to a 2.6.21 kernel, the problem seemed to go away (also back
> to 2.6.17, unfortunately I didn't have any sample points inbetween).
> I didn't have free time to spend bisecting attempting to find when the
> behavior started or stopped.
>
>   

That value, in nanoseconds, is 0x3fffd3a4c00.  The next second is 
0x40038d51600.  Is the wraparound at (0x400 << 32) significant?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-23 13:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-23 11:08 gettimeofday() jumping into the future Michael Smith
2007-08-23 11:36 ` Gerald Britton
2007-08-23 13:03   ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2007-08-23 20:09     ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-08-23 20:07   ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-08-23 11:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-23 12:20   ` Michael Smith
2007-08-23 18:47     ` john stultz
2007-08-25 16:44       ` Michael Smith
2008-03-30 21:17 ` Tim Ricketts
2008-03-31  7:18   ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-03 11:47     ` James Courtier-Dutton
2008-04-03 12:22       ` James Courtier-Dutton
2008-04-03 12:44         ` James Courtier-Dutton
2008-04-11 23:11           ` john stultz
2008-03-31  8:55   ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-03-31 16:03     ` John Stultz
2008-04-02 11:22       ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-04-02 23:57         ` Karsten Wiese
2008-04-03  6:28           ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-04-02  4:26   ` Mihai Donțu
2008-04-02  4:27     ` Mihai Donțu
     [not found] <47F3F313.7030803@vmware.com>
2008-04-02 22:40 ` Tim Mann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46CD85AC.7050805@argo.co.il \
    --to=avi@argo.co.il \
    --cc=gbritton@doomcom.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=msmith@xiph.org \
    --cc=wingo@fluendo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox