From: Paulo Marques <pmarques@grupopie.com>
To: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: greg@kroah.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] make kobject dynamic allocation check use kallsyms_lookup()
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 14:30:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46CD8C10.8000004@grupopie.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070822220341.7926F241@kernel>
Dave Hansen wrote:
> One of the top ten sysfs problems is that users use statically
> allocated kobjects. This patch reminds them that this is a
> naughty thing.
>
> One _really_ nice thing this patch does, is us the kallsyms
> mechanism to print out exactly which symbol is being complained
> about:
>
> The kobject at, or inside 'statickobj.2'@(0xc040d020) is not dynamically allocated.
>
> This patch replaces the previous implementation's use of a
> _sdata symbol in favor of using kallsyms_lookup(). If a
> kobject's address is a resolvable symbol, then it isn't
> dynamically allocated.
Just a few concerns that I'm not sure of having been addressed:
- doing a kallsyms_lookup() is more expensive then just a simple range
test. This might be a concern if this is called very often. In this case
you could keep the range check and only do the lookup for symbols that
fail that check
- kallsyms_lookup() never finds a symbol if CONFIG_KALLSYMS is not
selected
- more comments below
> The one exception to this is init symbols. The patch also
> checks to see whether __init memory has been freed and if
> it has will allow kobjects in those sections.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
> ---
>
> lxc-dave/arch/i386/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 2 --
> lxc-dave/include/linux/init.h | 1 +
> lxc-dave/init/main.c | 9 +++++++++
> lxc-dave/lib/kobject.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 4 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff -puN lib/kobject.c~make-kobject-allocation-debugging-check-use-kallsyms_lookup lib/kobject.c
> --- lxc/lib/kobject.c~make-kobject-allocation-debugging-check-use-kallsyms_lookup 2007-08-22 14:51:50.000000000 -0700
> +++ lxc-dave/lib/kobject.c 2007-08-22 14:51:50.000000000 -0700
> @@ -139,23 +139,36 @@ static int ptr_in_range(void *ptr, void
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void verify_dynamic_kobject_allocation(struct kobject *kobj)
> +void verify_dynamic_kobject_allocation(struct kobject *kobj)
> {
> - if (ptr_in_range(kobj, &_sdata[0], &_edata[0]))
> - goto warn;
> - if (ptr_in_range(kobj, &__bss_start[0], &__bss_stop[0]))
> - goto warn;
> - return;
> -warn:
> + char *namebuf;
> + const char *ret;
> +
> + namebuf = kzalloc(KSYM_NAME_LEN, GFP_KERNEL);
You don't need kzalloc here. kmalloc will do just fine.
> + ret = kallsyms_lookup((unsigned long)kobj, NULL, NULL, NULL,
> + namebuf);
> + /*
> + * This is the X86_32-only part of this function.
> + * This is here because it is valid to have a kobject
> + * in an __init section, but only after those
> + * sections have been freed back to the dynamic pool.
> + */
> + if (!initmem_now_dynamic &&
> + ptr_in_range(kobj, __init_begin, __init_end))
> + goto out;
> + if (!ret || !strlen(ret))
The "!strlen(ret)" is not only weird (why not write as "!ret[0] or
!*ret) but is also unnecessary. When kallsyms_lookup fails to find a
symbol it should always return NULL.
> + goto out;
> pr_debug("---- begin silly warning ----\n");
> pr_debug("This is a janitorial warning, not a kernel bug.\n");
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT
> - print_symbol("The kobject at, or inside %s is not dynamically allocated.\n",
> - (unsigned long)kobj);
> + pr_debug("The kobject at, or inside '%s'@(0x%p) is not dynamically allocated.\n",
> + namebuf, kobj);
> #endif
> pr_debug("kobjects must be dynamically allocated, not static\n");
> /* dump_stack(); */
> pr_debug("---- end silly warning ----\n");
> +out:
> + kfree(namebuf);
> }
> #else
> [...]
--
Paulo Marques - www.grupopie.com
"You're just jealous because the voices only talk to me."
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-23 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-22 22:03 [PATCH] make kobject dynamic allocation check use kallsyms_lookup() Dave Hansen
2007-08-23 5:18 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-08-23 8:21 ` Greg KH
2007-08-23 13:30 ` Paulo Marques [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46CD8C10.8000004@grupopie.com \
--to=pmarques@grupopie.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox